terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Hamplistemery.txt ? Here such counter-intuitive representation is settled for due to facility, abidance within the confines of a representational system now established, or the mere flawed whims of the system's creator that then becomes dominant by collective habit and familiarity if not cultural fiat. ? So degrees of change are conceptualized and considered as if in a present discrete amount, and symbolic representation meets contradictions as nearly identical representative methods are employed to suggest not necessarily direct opposite meanings as would likely be inferred, but different meanings in a totally different way. ? In the meantime, different prisms of truth or imagination, such as patterns, can be endlessly used to yield wholly unprecedented or satisfyingly (even comfortably) predictable results in an addictive pattern distracting from pressing priorities of further discovery, a pattern that must be vigilantly watched for; and the habit and cumulative familiar influence on, and results for, a set of beings can be difficult to overcome regardless of long-term benefit. ? This raises the dilemma of how to survive this means' development beyond the being's capabilities in a way akin to being itself, as well as the increasingly divided and extremely variant awareness topology of sets of the original being while specialism and cognitive isolationism grows -- particularly between those uniquely able and willing to grasp, engage with, or construct these means-become-beings and those not. ? Collective development of subsets of beings requires the pursuit of those finer details that can be the more deeply extrapolated therefrom, but this requires concurrent development of means by which to probe and engage them that are nonetheless beyond the means of the beings collectively that birthed them. ? Things sufficiently similar to known things are representatively reduced to them for their proven functionality (often in a manner sufficiently similar to the first figure) and for the ways in which their vast detail or infinitude defy the being's comprehension, let alone use, of them within the many boundaries of time, circumstance, and logistics imposed upon the being. ? We do not have enough at present to either possess or even articulate the whole truth, and still other beings can scarcely be articulated except by reference to their own unique inarticulableness (whether to all known beings or a subset in a particular instance), which mnemonic is to call to mind what of them is known or at least known roughly to be unknown (even if the extent of this cannot be sufficiently communicated). ? To this end, much of beings' comprehension is limited by time, memory, and range of intervening concern. ? In systems of information there are virtually limitless methods to represent a distinct and discrete reality, including to loosely reference at least part of the cause of its being; and the brevity of this representation can facilitate comprehension of a relation for discovering an (real or imagined, past, present, or future) effect or its cause.