94: NEFX - Buckaged

NEFX - Horrousnearling.txt ? The lucidity of this reality can itself ironically become clearer in present manifest cases when paralleled with now historically clear examples of it, i. ? Such entities and leaders of the cause of mass tribute, often frequently stigmatized within the culture of the domain in which they must contend, are more easily officially cast after official persecution as being connected and collaborating with another popularized scapegoat that often lays more materially and terrestrially outside the mass-perceived domain of the territorialist faction that the appendage serves (while ultimately serving the Blightgeist). ? The success and functionality of systems of mass tribute across history and context are marked in part by subsequent systemic efforts to quell them or even their implementation, the efforts especially carried out, influenced, or bribed by among the most opulent agents of the Blightgeist. ? In part for such reason, forums of support are to be held for those entities such as demand abidance of those who rue the ways of an aspect of the Blightgeist, and these entities may include for example the mass-centric parties for systemic mass tribute hailing from parts of the known world most familiar with both the principle of mass tribute and the conditions of its interruption, for which reason in part they in the first place are the more connected on average to the universal principle of mass tribute and providence. ? In each of these cases the entity for mass tribute, or more broadly that for the ultimate cause of Lightform, entail in thought a synthesis of contradictions, in essence making each who properly partake of the cause being three in nature unto themselves. ? The Blightgeist agents in question's preventative efforts may even seek to prevent the very implementation of such system in any way under the pretext of official code of the territorialist faction in which they operate, even seeking to take the matter to the factions' domain's grandest halls of officiality, in the latter's outpost in the sub-domain in which they dwell and rule. ? From destruction of self and outside the self, to lack of abode, and further still, the option of denial of a set of conditions such as the neuroses within the structures of default social formations (built largely around bloodlines) and labor is itself denied by the extant denial of the very medium of means that the territorialist faction (and the Blightgeist more broadly) insists upon as also being supposedly indelible and valid rather than manufactured and ultimately new and unessential in the grand historical scheme. ? Furthermore, the principle of compulsive mass tribute shoots through the specious notions of earnation underpinning conditioned mass acceptance of conditional imbalance throughout the known world and throughout the domain under focus in particular -- for much of what is had by some and not others is merely appropriated or seized through intergenerational givens, at kill-point or thievery direct and structural, and in any case statistically locational with respect to both concrete domain and social matrix rather than on deed and character. ? Said appendages carry out, secretly and out of common sight (including at select times before the usual peak of mass activity and wakefulness), attacks which are cast under the pretext of protection yet which do not answer to the nominal formal procedures of warranting that they put forth as following, which are themselves mass-pacifying projections growing less effective still. ? The origin of much proposed character (especially of a supposedly indelible and pre-ordained sort) finds root in concrete conditions, and the confusion of one for another constitutes an entire thought matrix that is one of many prisms and filters through which Blightegeistian vision predominates in its era. ? So the forums of support declare, that you who are three shall not be successfully or unredemptively set upon by the Blightgeist. ? These systems may have a concrete arc, an idea, yet poised at times to go south with the punishing impulse that grabs them. ? These attacks are usually upon the (often personal and individual) loci of entities of mass tribute and mass well-being, so malice, yet should tell of the actual nature and intent of the appendages' aims and values. ? Moreover, such dire conditions work together with mass cultural conditioning thoughtforms (or, what is more to say, thought viruses) disseminated by the parent culture under the Blightgeist to inculcate thought-funneling fallacies such as the prizing of being-as-subset and hate-spurred attacks, the prevention of which foster survival and thrival on an individual and mass scale. ? e. ? This recognition in principle in turn is, in a more practical circumstantial sense, a reason for their generally worsened conditions, due to persecution by appendages of the Blightgeist such as be eyeing them. ? Such systems of mass tribute, while ultimately tentative pending the overthrow of the parent system that necessitates them, belie a recognition growing in mass consciousness (if only spurred on by mere circumstance laying bare the concrete reality) that lack of necessitated means such as even a hollow medium of means within the shadow of the Blightgeist, spells trouble for an increasing number of beings in that they can no longer meet the by-then normalized general processes of existence and subsistence as defined and allowed within the territorialist faction in question. ? when parallel appendages of the Blightgeist set upon similar entities. ? This further reveals how much such thought-viruses are correlatable products of privation itself as it seeps into various aspects of the societal structure.