102: NEFX - Absuwandet

terminal 0

unfinished

From the archives

NEFX - Pictiventroes.txt ? But to bring such thoughts to light is to destroy them. ? Here the (rightly or wrongly) identified conditions of the geographical Other can be wrapped up in a phantom of the likewise bogey thoughtform, against which any known uprising (be it actually along practical territorialist lines) is painted as inspiring enough to excuse the content of individual actions supposedly carried out in the a new of this (further pretext to the acting out of the same by the domestic party), and that this could all be thanks to the benevolence of the current domestic “masters” (explicitly stated as such or not). ? Here, where such atrocity (such as martial rule) is seen from the outside in an already stigmatized Other in the form of the separate territorialist faction, domestic spirit can be drummed up into both condemnation of the act as such as supposedly only happening in the Other and also the condoning and carrying out of such atrocity on and by domestic force for the supposed securement of present known conditions — as though in a necessary retaliation masking its actual initiation by the domestic party. ? Indeed, with the bogey of potential loss of technical and comfortable conditions (vaguely flattened and alluded to as “economy”), further defiling of beings at large especially along biological-geographical phantasmic lines “abroad” from the faction’s domestic center are allowed, further feeding into a de facto attitude of brutality against the Other; such as may be found in conditioning beings to march to their doom in territorialist battle (be it on another faction’s behalf for myopic “long-term” geopolitical gain) that brings ruin while having the convenient pretext of nobly preventing an invasion or atrocity upon them by a third party. ? Even domestic assets may be sold off to this end, further putting the lie to the Blightgeistian prizing of insistently boundaried domesticity as a pretext to its various brutalities. ? Key in the source of this division is decisions of statecraft which ensure the re-centering of a territorialist faction (particularly along geographical-biological phantasmic lines) as a world capital of resource control and exchange at the expense of conditions both domestic and abroad, which are not registered as such because the dominating Erosive thoughtform measures conditions according to the most amount of resource accumulation in the slightest possible chosen fiefdom (which may indeed center around the leading key agent in question for their faction and their “closest” [which is rather to say most seemingly expedient] other beings) — and here again the faction’s leadership’s target conditioned demographic finds a sense of success in at least the presence of those umbraged, the dreaded Other getting less in the deal as the imperial impulse is strengthened and technical financial conditions are at least nominally or provisionally improved by the brutal enforcement of austere conditions that wreck cooperatives formed for the securement of means, resources, and conditions for beings at large. ? Given that such brutality on a high official structural level is the crowning achievement to mass consciousness of certain effects — namely, stark division across countless beings in perception of it and its actor (generally the Blightgeistian key agent), which division in the Blightgeistian consciousness serves as a key indicator of the validity of the actor’s actions and beliefs — validity is found to accord with the degree of mass division in perception (not necessarily of actual action), and in fact the public favor cannot be truly felt, believed in, or fully registered in consciousness (let alone as being valid) without the mere presence of intense umbrage; partly because favor depends on the perception of an Other getting less, and partly because on a pure structural level such public favor (based in a contentment that is incomplete, depraved, and derived in perception on the lack of contentment in an Other) rests only on the conditions that are at the expense of beings at large and in particular on those with the umbrage. ? Where such brutality, particularly on a structural and indirectly effected level, lacks this cushion, it is considered not strength (even if not not strength) but stupidity in the Blightgeistian consciousness, and regardless of its inner content and parent context is not generally thought of thereafter — not least of all because the actor in this situation is shuffled away into one of the Blightgeistian faction’s institutions of persecution, quite literally outside of range of mass perception. ? its own mass supporters who swear by brute force). ? e. ? The deceitful phantom of principle-via-bare-conviction — in which perseverant, untrammeled malice and combativeness afforded by material and structural conditions (generally inherited), and supported by a mass societal conditioning to likewise malignant thoughtforms, passes as strength-as-such — finds public face in office and statecraft, where that which continuously destroys untrammeled from within the highest halls of officiality finds depraved favor among those who swear by the universal validity and determination of the barest brute force in all things — even as the official force spurns this very “principle” by its being founded in technically civilized being in all its avoidances of the nature and environment in which such theoretical brute force could flourish, at the very most only annulling itself by the attainment of its goal and so being then opposed to itself (i.

Logging off...