104: NEFX - Brairfered

NEFX - Burnstristle.txt ? It takes an entire reconception of the order and relations of beings and their possibilities beyond these ingrained bounds and terms to transcend this even as a perceived possibility. ? With one part of them planted in this area and another in the accomplishment of technically helpful and provisionally necessary deeds for such beings, maintaining direct communication especially on resource-allocation deeds to be done for causes within smaller and more intimate geographical-populational units, and nominally holding gatherings that relate to issues "on the ground" and even occur there, they remain ever hollowly ingratiated. ? For so long as an entire section of the territorialist faction's conditioning apparatus technically nominally beyond the halls of officiality (albeit clearly with an at-least tenuous link) is a channel through which said viers may communicate according to its bylines, they may remain constantly in the event horizon of beings at large within the territorialist bounds (both officially-geographically and actually-mentally). ? And as the system's methods may become both generally more in line with the general tendencies of beings and at the same time do their work in conditioning them or maintaining or increasing their own stronghold, this persistence trends higher across generations. ? Yet to be entrenched in this is to generally ensure continued presence even across preset durations of occupancy. ? This can be concerning the vier's pre-existing material conditions, resources, and means, or their demonstrated understanding of the techniques for the system'a conditioning apparatus. ? Thus such positions as concern the aforementioned structural scheme or populational-geographical units cannot generally abide "novices" in such conditions -- and where they do, this is generally with respect to one prerequisite field for which another more than compensates for the vier. ? To this point, eminence and unusual pre-possession of resources can play a role, whether due to a by-then pre-existing Blightgeistian mentality fueling materially successful mercenary pursuit (be it even in technical official civic action) or inheritance of such conditions (more likely a combination); and in any case, the core awareness (however dimly perceived and buried, especially according to the inherently myopic Blightgeistian mind) of the runner's own conditions as resting on the boards against being-as-such is more easily (however temporarily and ultimately futilely) repressed in the greater securement and expansion of these conditions predicated on a notion of an ever-fleetingness of their means and possibilities. ? But these more technically and logistically based qualifications interact with those based more in core notions of the territorialist faction and more broadly the Blightgeist, such as in the demonstrated ability to partake in its conditioning apparatus even via learned social rapport with those the system is at least provisionally or nominally intended to serve. ? This extends as well to the broader geographical-populational units in another sense, with likewise distinctly calculated benchmarks of dwelling-in for qualification. ? Other qualifications may originate in logistical concern and yet may develop (even post-hoc out of distorted collective cultural memory regarding the founding notions for a structural system) into one concerning territorialist logic that within such a faction’s framework takes hold upon principles and actions anyway concerning the runner's nativity to the geographical-populational unit they may seek official position for. ? Even from the outset the aforementioned notions of seniority lie at the gates to admittance. ? But more broadly the Blightgeistian subject, being heir to the legacy and seeming (however provisional and depraved) benefits of its conditioning apparatus, joins in the scrambling race in everlasting vain thirst for the phantasmic goal of ultimate pyrrhic power-seizure, which pyrrhicness they do not realize until it is too late, either upon failing to reach the destination or, what's actually worse for them, reaching it beyond all resistance only to find nothing — be it under the hollow pretext of duty or topical concern which they may even to a degree naively initially believe until deeply embedded in the processes and sacrifices of the various positions and entailed compromises. ? In a life course of avarice via the imagined straight path which may seem to leave no mark of stigma to bring out for scrutiny upon vying for the position, after as long as a lifetime of interest in rooting out the same in others, the seeker makes their break, and in so doing creating new marks if not revealing actual ones whose stigmatizing character they may have underestimated. ? Whence then the drive for such position? ? Inevitably this gives any one of such “spectral points" the veneer of favor of being-as-such when they vie (especially successfully) for the removal of at least a personnel of the other for a thought or action predicated against being-as-such, even if either not truly for that reason or in a way that elides in the meantime the way in which the removing party is itself by mere presence within a part of the Blightgeist to be likewise predicated against being-as-such (even before the actuality of their actions are examined for the same) ? What's more, they may represent increasingly fractional micro-interests and shades of intermingling thought forms as would most seem to immediately benefit the holder, be the position adopted post-hoc per the requirements of their position and according pyrrhic (if even truly achieved or achievable) route to the Blightgeistian goal of total power-seizure. ? These too may play a shadow role in the official decisions (be they either influenced by the coercive mechanisms of the system in which they operate or not truly autonomous decisions at all) of the more prominent and iconistic roles within the halls of officiality. ? Indeed, various needs and concerns in general may accumulate which have provisional necessity to be met at least in the meantime through the means afforded by the territorialist faction's system, such that to undercut the latter would be to at least in the short-term undercut the former at great moral and vital cost. ? The various forms of official gatherings, however solemn and ad hoc, are needed within the faulty logical frame work and bounds of the system in order to accommodate these various provisional necessities and contradictions. ? What’s more, the accumulation of various needs and complications across iterations and generations of the system more behooves this. ? Even the rigidity of sub-factional warfare from within rulership gates cannot completely account for the various provisionally necessary, practical, or logistical concerns as may compel respective fighters to cooperate across many such lines, be it for their own respective stakes in the long-term pyrrhic power seizure that is (ironically) the very uniting Blightgeistian principle. ? The driving interest in these forms of gatherings and their degree of officiality and official recognition may vary, and may be along various sorts of lines. ? Yet even beyond the various machinations and dark secrets of such rule-deliberating structural scheme within the halls of officially we find as previously distracted from the various taxonomies of gatherings as various other underling key agents participate in, themselves generally alienated from their context or hermeneutics in daily remembering (if indeed it could be called remembering at all). ? Moreover, given that the type of internal set of rules that is passed down by higher-ranking key agents within the structural scheme influences greatly whether such proposed form of rulership will reach deliverance, it further covertly influences the "free" actions and decisions of underling key agents within such scheme in their broaching of matters for rulership. ? Always compelled by provisional necessity in the moment and yet in part for that reason being almost exclusively relevant to the most immediate and fleeting parent context, they are at once self-aggrandizing and self-defeating means of trying to keep an envisioned form of rulership from dilution by the sub-factional warfare and logistics of the official process, even as doing so inevitably feeds into it. ? Indeed, across generations and the deeper entrenchment of sub-factional warfare within the halls of officiality, various means are found in which to tailor these official structural systemic processes and rule-sets to leverage sub-factional holds even as doing so further complicates the bounds and contours of the system as is decided by the accumulation of rulership attained this way over time. ? In any case concerning these two and especially in the following form of rule, the mere allowance, the half-measure, the partial retracting of a pre-plunged blade into underlings, is used as bait into acceptance of the scheme and its underlying so-called principle, especially as a supposed barometer of “objectivity" — here in another form of rule-craft where changes can be made or even broached for certain parts of an officially delivered (or soon-to-be-delivered) form of rulership. ? Here too said key agent may have their own internal time table of arbitrary enforcement in which at different points the mere broaching at all is closed, which can thereby be a (however ultimately myopic but structurally allowed and, what's more, fed into the mind by advance writ) strategy towards pressuring the branching of concerns for the formulation of rulership by timetable and within the range wanted, especially insofar as the broachers stand thereby to ascend within the ranks of the structural scheme. ? Within this a specific form of rulership at their discretion may be established which proposes to annul itself, yet which requires its own sanctioning to exist, that of the “open rule”, where that which is considered sufficiently relevant (itself a semantic tactic to slide through the arbitrary throwing about of structural power) is permitted. ? Here too may the higher-ranking key agent within the structural scheme use both influence and intimidation to frame that which can be branched and deliberated on, according to specific delineated rules. ? Yet by the same time the objective logic dictates that such constriction be required for the logistical execution of the faction’s will given its Blightgeistian origin, in particular the management of gatherings and deliberation on rulership, especially in timetables of running and “speaking times" and in the range of topics and concerns to be broached and have rulership made for. ? Ultimately, the very existence of a nominally being-saving branch of the territorialist faction's structural system as an intermediary between the will and needs of beings-at-large on one hand and those of the Blightgeist’s key agents on the other requires it (within its own logical framework) to be highly constricted in a way that appears to be for the magnanimous sacrifice for being-as-such. ? Indeed, the mere official establishment and declaration of such new provision may omit certain loopholes such as where those limited in their duration of official occupancy may not be so within another unit of the same, allowing for "musical chairs” — aside from how such establishment and declaration may be for a purpose of conditioning given that the ultimate essence and unchecked reign of the scheme is not significantly altered. ? For that matter, given the nature of this structural scheme anyways, the official durational limit of role-occupation within it only intensifies the mad desperation and ruthlessly slashing spirit within it, to say nothing of the ways in which (even ignoring again the malign essence of the Blightgeist whence such scheme is birthed) it may be for a soon-dated short-term ad-hoc attempt to leverage a sub-faction's official hold in the structure. ? The eventual gradual at-least-nominal reform of this tendency across time is only the mere dispersement and conditional rearrangement of the extant malign power pool of the system. ? Seeing now too late what the position entails, they pivot it into the management of what they know to be likewise fear in the underlings which they once ranked as, and thereby decide accordingly who should be accepted within and for which role, as well as the allocation of the structure’s resources and currency -- the self-defeat lying in that the most powerful and able to carry out said chair’s wishes would be so by the fearful desperation and also power that is most threatening to the chair itself, forcing them to split the difference between erring on such side and erring on the side of what is a technical incompetence according to an inherently corrupt principle driving the structural scheme (to say nothing of the broader structural system, territorialist faction, and Blightgeist itself). ? Specifically, in the paradoxical phenomenon of malign masterhood, the fear willingly endured by the key agent in the process of integration into, and ascension within, a structural scheme, is harnessed and carried into the foremost hierarchical position within. ? For that matter, mere conformity to the structural scheme may lead to such assignments with any qualifications nominally stated post-hoc. ? Even so, they may be coveted among the more high-ranking within such structural scheme for the ways in which they may appear to serve certain of the territorialist domain's units, particularly geographical-populational ones -- further entrenching the paradoxical phenomenon of malign masterhood. ? This is of course aside from the prizing of seniority, which is not to say the mere endurance of time itself even within the halls of officiality but in the testing of inoculation towards the principle-death of the Blightgeist — and indeed, where one is in the first place integrated into the system and is thereby inwardly compelled to rise further within (even if out of a sense of sunk cost fallacy, to say nothing of various other possible influences), principle will be slaughtered for a plum assignment. ? The ability of key agents and in particular those within snitch-roles to place within this scheme may hinge largely on their ability and willingness to navigate such a dynamic of hierarchy. ? That is, insofar as a foremostly (at least at the time of the system's conception) strategical territorialist faction's official structural system is erected at all, it requires the arrangement of both "more" and "less" important units such as official gathering-groups so that the “more" important may draw more engineered attention and the "less" important may carry on at-best open secrets lost in the entire inscrutable scene of Blightgeistian action. ? Others may be selected out of want of aforementioned options or strategically, though the nature of secrecy in such territorialist faction's structural system may mean simply that some official topic-or-concern-based gatherings are less emphasized precisely because of the more subtle and covert schemes against being-as-such being carried out, which by contrast and juxtaposition seem acceptable and part of a "natural" hierarchy of importance to those outside concerning the entire terrain of official gatherings in the system. ? Some such gatherings may be more prominent or culturally important in their parent context, such as deal with the mere concern of how processes of the official structural system are carried out, the management of its currency, and decisions on rulership. ? To that point, different key agents in snitch roles may take different circumstantially-influenced circuitous routes through the different halls of official gathering as may appear to most secure their long-term hold in the halls of officiality and according structural power (such desire competing of course with their own respective personally subjectve topical fixations as may influence their attempted joining of some moment to moment). ? The higher-ranking key agents within the system may thereby shepherd their layers of snitches and sub-snitches according to their own strategy and topical fixations in the thirsty and miserable agitation for their sub-faction’s structural triumph for the fleeting moment. ? Whether by ingrained individual intent or the mere constrictedness of the very erected system and the according expectations of the higher-ranking key agents within the system's structure (be it so resentfully clung to for the sake of the long-term pyrrhic power seizure scheme that is at the heart of the Blightgeist), this ability and willingness to engage in the rhetoric and deceit of such official gatherings becomes the concern around which many key agents’ decisions pivot. ? By the same token, they may also gather for the purpose of streamlining an agreed upon method of official communication for one of their officially decided-upon and delivered form of rulership. ? Such gatherings are even formed for the express purpose of the collective attempt to apprehend the whole of the highly inter-contradicting structure that the system's key agents play in. ? It may thereby be assumed by many (and this general yielded assumption is by merely clever though not intellectually substantial design) that the superficially complex machinations of the system's structure are indicative of only the most substantial and worthy minds as currently tend to or conceive of it, rather than a tangled nest that ensnares even its deepest framers and participants and eludes even their total event horizon -- for such horizon as would be sufficient to apprehend it would thereby transcend it. ? Even so, the actual intent or habitual outcome of such different morphologies of official gatherings may be eclipsed, particularly in the ways in which certain of them may not deal with official decision as much as inter-suggestion and informing. ? That is to say, they may be meant to deal primarily with the structural and logistical matters of the system structure itself regarding its own personnel, while putting forth the veneer of diplomacy and the aforementioned objectivity. ? To such ends, many different official gatherings in both habitual form and outward stamp may form which further obscure how much official structural power each of them may have by sheer fiat beyond their official pledges to "objective structure and inter-checking”, even if by the mere naming or official arrangement of personnel from different system branches in the gathering. ? For that matter, the mere addressing of the scandal of official conduct via such gatherings may be enough to make it appear as though they are engaged with the content of such scandals rather than their mere panicked attempted assuaging. ? They also grant the visage of legitimacy to officiality in the nominal freedom of such gatherings to be formed for any topic that may strike the participants' fancy, appearing to show genuine concern for topics that concern beings at large even as they do not appear to directly pertain to concerns of officiality. ? Given these gatherings' usual short lifespan and perfunctoriness, they are often more for information than for official deciding, at least within themselves. ? Diverting time and focus from the already legion issues and according gatherings with according timetables (complete with agendas and quotas to meet among the systemically aspirational), they make ritual out of the myopia of specialization and funnel-thought. ? But even beyond this general form of official gathering may be those gatherings which arise more impromptu in response to present or unprecedented matters. ? Funneled and tunneled as these working key agents are, however willingly and mercenarily, they are wont to not conceive of issues and their solutions except as pertain to their sphere and as are solved through the topic-pertinent thought processes they have grown accustomed to. ? flora and fauna), the delegation of operations to different branches or factions, means of battle, allocation of resources especially in terms of officially designated mediums and currencies, the restriction or permission thereof, conditioning and production systems, means of change within the halls of officially and its rules, interfacing with other distinctive beings and parties thereof, material and scientific advancement; the conception, evaluation, and deliverance of rulership; and means of movement and travel.