terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Chamerhanize.txt ? In such instance of deception the actual nature and degree of a supposed threat must be inflated by the colluding Blightgeistian party for their own ingratiation to, and protection from, the watchful lash of the controlling party in this instance (see The Gehlen Organization); and this inevitably leads to their sharing of bogus information and their hyping of a bogey in the enemy which therefore makes this appeasing party (or at least key official thereof) appealing in the meantime by sheer contrast and the act of pointing out such bogey in their supposed threatening action. ? Inevitably, this leads to further conflict down the line between said two parties that further proves the enterprise's ultimately self-defeating nature and yet in the meantime harms beings at large in an enterprise against being as such which the beings at large themselves stand by moral (not to mention basic survivalist) obligation to resist and counter. ? Such misinformation involved between the two "colluding" parties (whether truly or just nominally for respective parasitic personal gain) is also generally motivated by pride as is derived primarily from geographical grounding and general self-contrast from a perceived Other (be it in some ways even each other), and also to inflate one party's own usefulness in the latter's cause so as to in turn use that other party in the Blightgeistian collusion, such as through status of a shared enemy society's current military might in contrast to said society's actual privation at the time -- and the pride of the tormented Erosive soul leaves it eager to overlook any potential deception out of the necessity of the statements’ truth for the (at least imagined) enterprise of the territorialist faction to be “valid" and realized. ? The irony of such schemes by territorialist tentacles of the Blightgeist is that it not only serves as a bridge between stages or degrees of severity of their official branches of brutality and surveillance and the like even where this is not initially intended (particularly by previous generational or administrative founders of the original institution), but much information gathered from the used parties (including over the course of years, say, a decade) is false and deceptive, given that the latter inevitably are themselves territorialist branches of the Blightgeist with their own agenda whose mutual enmity with the original controlling party is in fact part and parcel of the total logic of the Blightgeist. ? The fact that those in its ranks not only most powerful but in practice most suitable to such a surveillant and ultimately imperialist venture happen to be those of most proven atrocity (particularly of the systemic sort) is at best ignored by the using party (see the cases of Augsburg, Barbie, Bolschwing, Skorzeny, etc). ? This eventual bogey, itself a Blightgeistian faction of proven atrocity, is blessed and galvanized to expand its brutalistic power. ? The eventual bogey’s seeming meantime provisional necessity as a pawn in a worldwide Blightgeistian power seizure game itself conditions affinity for their own ideology that is ultimately the same in purpose, for it is (however unconsciously) a symptom of the Blightgeist; and such uses include the establishment and tapping of information networks in enemy territories. ? It is only with honest investigation later on (particularly as Blightgeistian conditioning paints the present territorialist power’s now rose-toned canon historical battle as being in a battle for principle against a geographically-grounded cartoon bogey) that one may find the truth that the historical bogeys of a particular territorialist faction are in fact their historical ally in both persuasion and actual concrete historical relationship. ? To this end, warmongering agents of territorialist domains of the Blightgeist will by turns (or, what’s more, at the same time in different places and operations, with at least one of these being largely secret) either target or use (in a manner similar to that described above) different being subsets along faultlines of rigid territorialist boundaries whence their putrid souls’ sense of identity are largely derived or pure mercenariness, both of which inevitably contradict and conflict with each other; while fronting their imperialistic ventures as in an ultimate battle for global principle that is nonetheless somewhat geographically (or, what is more to say, territorially) grounded for general consumption by the masses of the Blightgeist’s culturally conditioned subjects for further pawn-like use in ensuing battle. ? Said tentacles in the form of budding new institutions of eventual likewise world-cultural standing may temporarily “disband” upon the completion of a task to such ends, but this mere fact alone does not account for not only the optics strategy in doing so with a longer-term view towards more powerful systemic worldwide persecution, but also the chain of conditions set into motion that “necessitates” the more malicious resurrection of such an institution, and the newly fed addictive nature of the absolute power seizure enterprise of the Blightgeist in all of its tentacles. ? Long-established world-cultural institutions with standing to protect are ripe picking by mercenary tentacles of the Blightgeist for leveraging in imperialist and specifically surveillance operations, even (if not especially) where the reasons and needs of both parties are different and even inter-conflicting; for the meantime motivations in collusion may be provisionally necessary in that moment of collusion for Blightgeistian purposes.