terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Laudent.txt ? Here too consciousness of content beyond the criteria of the Blightgeist or the mass conditioning or socialization it entails would be made clear without a cost to the importance of socialization, but rather to its deeper and more principled understanding and betterment. ? The prizing and willful allocation of time towards this end, especially on any recognized “official level”, would itself raise consciousness and principle among beings at large, in service of the enterprise of being-as-such — for it would be consciousness of consciousness, and by extension provide a more clear historiography (which is history of history). ? To this end, fresh consciousness and examinations of surroundings both physical and figurative would clue the being further into the primordial principles underlying them. ? It would aim at recognizing the impetus to ideas as they currently prevail and comprise a set of spatio-temporally contained and culturally provided “givens”. ? Such conditioning would aim at the exploration of the precise detail and content of notions in part by tracing their origins by not mere outward research and history, but by intact logical processes. ? It takes a kind of conscious counter-conditioning — or, what is more to say, proactive conditioning independent of reaction, as of primordial conditioning of truth in yet a newer and more conscious orientation — to help beings (including one’s self) to attain to Lightform consciousness itself, a conditioning which is done transparently and cooperatively as between peers or between benefactors and pupils. ? The general conditions imposed by the Blightgeist do themselves condition beings into the desperate suckling of the branch of dispersed content posited as separate and away from those very conditions — not to mention the notions that create them, or yet other conditions insofar as such conditions as the said dispersed content and the consumption and enjoyment thereof are built on the boards of largely-hidden or ignored atrocity happening far away from the territorialist branch whose narrow self-focus is another aspect of the Blightgeist. ? The prizing of this mass content MERELY QUA its appeal to mass beings is championed by Saturation, and its failures are used as a pretext by Erosion for more imposition on beings at large (not to mention as such), which Saturation on the one hand gives room for and allows and yet on the other hand is too naive and of a general incomplete mindset regarding being-as-such to properly oppose or even know (how) to oppose. ? By setting the general conceptual boundary within which mass thought can take place via the Blightgeist’s mass cultural conditioning apparatus, that which is catered to (especially in terms of the aforementioned power of memory and the prizing — that is to say, distortion — thereof) is posited as being proof of the power of mass beings within the Blightgeist, in different ways by both the Erosive and Saturative branch of it. ? To this end, thoughts are conditioned not only generally, but in terms of desires that themselves are thoughts — desires for more general thoughts that feed into the cumulative self-perpetuating effect of mass conditioning especially under the Blightgeist. ? The cocoon offered by the constant influx of socialization and material comfort is soothing, nay, intoxicating ? Insulated as beings at large are from the full implications and ramifications of their general net sum “givens”, the full validity and value of things accords with that which in their immediate ambit yields pleasure or pain, reward or punishment. ? Yet it is not remembrance itself either which is at fault — and such a mentality that it is is part and parcel of the Saturative side of Blightgeistian thought — but rather the prizing of it as such, or the prizing of any spatio-temporal phantom as such in any direction. ? Partly in both the initial cultivation and later “responsive” rewarding of memory with that which both validates and plays into memory, especially fond memory. ? And how is such thought-funneling cultivated through socialization and mass-broadcast content? ? Yet this phenomenon is not an indictment of socialization as such, but rather the way in which it is leveraged and tainted as to produce an effect, which consists even in the reflexive condemnation of socialization itself upon realization of the wrongness of such socialization, which realization in the first place is only a form of consciousness within the slowly established framework of the Blightgeist that plays the thinker right back into its clutches. ? That which is given and immediate, particularly on a visibly (whether factually or not, validly or not) mass level, sitting at the precipice between the seeming threat of total ostracization bordering on exile from life itself or the presently visible sustaining conditions thereof on one hand, and a steady stream of rewards through compliance on the other, is one of the most powerfully and widely mass conditioning forces — even where such system is so ambient as to be only subconsciously registered. ? Sometimes, especially with mass media, there is barely even rearrangement. ? Many beings are hard-pressed to think much beyond what their socialization tells them to think, or want to think.