NEFX - Puland.txt ? One who sees past this mirage is already a step ahead, and in their own right and to themselves testifies to the validity of being as such. ? Yet it takes collective, cultivated, and proactive consciousness of that truth in all its ramifications for revolution of being to take place, and this ironically (given the Blightgeistian notions of evolution and revolution to which we are so brutally heir) leads further to the very development that the Blightgeist both does not desire for beings at large to achieve and blames them precisely for not achieving on a supposedly inherent level, conceiving of development as being so static and historically only not static so as to both culminate and physically permanently coagulate in this very moment (with perhaps fundamental exception for themselves, who may envision themselves as being able to bypass such limits with). ? Thus, beings must wager on this validity, and by doing so in thought and action achieve the kind of flourishing that testifies to it. ? Where communal regard for beings at large even among those normatively deemed burdensome by the Blightgeist yields demonstrable flourishing and benefit, this testifies to the validity of being as such. ? Where beings carve out a niche of thought, invention, and form of living, that testifies to the validity of being as such. ? Where the achievements and conditions of beings differ from that of their kin, that testifies to the validity of being as such. ? But the fight for being as such by beings, whether individually in their various motivations and agendas or at large, cannot truly be blamed -- not where their flourishing is most guaranteed by its recognition and embracement, to say nothing of transcendental and communal service thereto even where it may lead to extinguishment of said being (and indeed this is where the validity of a being as extinguishing resource may be at least provisionally valid, resting first upon the validity of the being’s being as such). ? Even in the tenderest form of this, any supposed good will is fake, as though the proposed “truth” were not so wanted and were just dealt with, and delivered solemnly and impartially from on high for which the proponent is apparently and curiously a proxy or manifestation. ? But severity unto itself is not the basis of truth, nor does it directly correlate with it; and the underlying premise of the otherwise notion is disingenuous, calling into question why its proponent needs so much this power seizure via ontology and epistemology, and so bullishly insists upon it. ? Indeed, the notion of truth purely by severity, with any logical proof arising only after the fact, and the supposed annulment of any hysterical illogic consisting merely in opposition towards a (real or alleged) emotion regardless of the emotional core and affect of the ontological oppressor in this equation, may have much currency when the Blightgeist is strong throughout beings at large. ? Against this many a specious reductionistic interpretation of the discoveries of the ages has been leveraged as though to show that, absolutely and perennially, being is only valid as subset (though indeed subsets of being under the Blightgeist differ to a degree in their schema of this, in a way both inter conflicting and conveniently prizing of themselves), and that such notion would not be so brutal if it were not true. ? Thus the NEFX enterprise holds that being as such is valid as a birthright. ? Bound as beings are to survival, such enterprise of survival being the more fueled by and dependent on the premise of their own being’s very validity, each being must wager that their being and being as such is valid, and strive accordingly; for otherwise their very being and enterprises are absurd — and besides, the brutalisitc prizing of survival among Erosive proponents of the Blightgeist itself permits, no, CHAMPIONS this very survivalism even as it expects certain beings as subsets to lay down for extinguishment. ? Conversely, if being as such is invalid as opposed to being as subset along conceived lines of bio-rank, institutional adherence, and the like, each move or breath among countless beings is futile, and any universally valid action on their part is so only occasionally if not accidentally, and consisting mainly in service and subjugation towards a supposed predestined supreme subset of being. ? For where the validity of being as such and all its according ramifications are remembered, individual beings have potential, and are for that matter the more valid as potentiates, memories, and extinguishing resources as circumstances may have it, and for the most noble and edifying causes most respecting of the will and abilities of beings (often picked by said beings themselves). ? The terrestrial object of ultimate concern (as differentiated from the celestial or universal object), at least according to the NEFX enterprise, is being as such, and its total championing, protection, and validity, both terrestrially and celestially — that is to say, being as such as opposed to being as mere potentiate, memory, or extinguishing resource (least of all in service of bloodshed) as the Blightgeist and particularly its Erosive element may hold.