151: NEFX - Jawsstak

terminal 0

unfinished

From the archives

NEFX - Motverills.txt ? This notion could arise simply from the intimidation at the great mass of thoughtpieces to be grappled with under the belief that knowledge and means of attaining to the ultimate are objective and separate from individual mortal perception rather than actually inevitably bound up with them in the specific context of that perception -- which is not to say that truth is not attainable, but rather that different elements are inevitably employed in each of these various contexts to find it, each of varying method and validity but nonetheless all pieces of the puzzle. ? The presumed truth of the futility of this quest is itself a truth that yet does not reveal more or furnish the individual with the freedom that truth would entail so much as stops and decays it. ? For that matter, the presumption of this futility is itself a form of "knowledge" itself limited but furthermore willingly impotent, and taken up as an end position ironically misses the salient fruit of its logic as antithetical part and parcel of an ultimate truth whose logic itself ought to be held in question; whereas to commit to the true grappling with the ultimate finds allows one to find further in their quest various more epistemological pieces (themselves valid or not) that make the as-yet impenetrable and infinite-seeming ultimate. ? After all, the prism through which we bear the Real is to be recognized as such and not upon immediate encounter or use (however seemingly immediately fruitful) as a piece of total validity and of the ultimate, and yet at any rate not to be neglected or balked at as completely futile. ? More specifically, the refractions we witness in the limitations of the instruments employed are themselves sub-laws of error not to be altogether discarded so much as tarried with and its valid content separated from invalid. ? That is to say that although found relations in the meantime journey towards comprehension of the ultimate may be erroneous, this error itself is inhered in the ultimate as a form of contradiction and emptiness to be filled and corrected. ? Ultimately the ultimate's nature as that which at the beginning eludes us could potentially contain within it the truth of validity in striving at it even by remote and limited means, if only that we get a bit closer. ? To remove from the ultimate supposedly arrived at at least one of the instruments employed to arrive at it (said instrument itself supposedly comprehended fully as a matter of course) is not necessarily to render the ultimate as incomprehensible and incomplete as it was prior to the employment of the instrument, seeing as such instrument would supposedly not be alone in such employment and seeing as the journey of understanding could still be present after the at least experimental annulment of the truth of the instrument to get at the truth of the ultimate, even if the ultimate is that which contains all as inhering in it; for this ultimate could include the various contradictions and false notions by which the true is true, and the ultimate could be as a swirling spiral of inter-conflicting yet thereby inter-balancing components that at each stage are of a different nature than that beside or below it yet which nonetheless contain by varying points certain parallels to what came before and yet are of that beyond time except as mortals can conceive of it in linear logic-fashion.

Logging off...