terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Sickupences.txt ? For that matter one must question the criteria by which we assess our own development relative to that of other beings — if mere concrete development itself suffices for the answer, given points of unsustainability and destruction. ? The clues for this can be discovered in the tracing of timelines and habitats for the beings who by turns diverged and converged with other prior forms of the present known beings. ? There may yet have been (or currently be) lesser known paths of evolution occurring which defy our collective sensibilities. ? In tracing these many forks in becoming of which we may be part we can behold the phantoms of possibility in parallel realities, hauntingly evading us like mysteriously lost children or siblings. ? Moreover, we can see that this is non-linear, but often happening parallel in a manner only later (if ever, however conclusively we could determine) joining. ? They can defy even commonly known layers of classification or organization for ease of meaning in seeking to understand ourselves, while nonetheless carrying distinctive features that we can identify to ourselves and yet also in other things not culminated in many ways into ourselves with our givens. ? Yet the core roots themselves underlying our being and our givens can run deeper and more primordially than is initially imagined, for it can predate several layers of capacity for conception of the real (or the self). ? We can for that matter further trace the general path of realization that attends collective evolution in the events which lead to the evolutions heretofore. ? Yet by the same token the apparent acceleration of development according to historical pattern can be a sign that we are yet to reach a new unprecedented stage sooner than generally registers to the event horizon. ? Here we find ourselves more dynamic with realization untethered from Blightgeistian mass conditioning. ? The actual wildness and recentness relative to inherited myth opens new possibility. ? And such given may not be as perennial even theoretically as is initially thought. ? For at any rate the revolutions in evolution or development were themselves divergent in form, method, and result acting yet upon further subsequent methods, and which thereafter would converge (advertently or not) and help culminate in the present given. ? That present beings would, ironically per a self-made phantasm of tradition, seek to attack the very means that brought them to such point of capacity, is a collective existential quandary to be solved. ? Still the details of collective history stand to be raised against the growing myth weeds of a supposed objectivity to biogeophantasms, mercenariness, and brutalistic isolationism. ? tools and instruments). ? e. ? What we now register as elementary could be unfathomable to us in its conception without its outward form there (i. ? There are many such forks in other pivotal moments, further showing we are our own aliens. ? This given itself may diverge from a parallel reality in which but the slightest difference in happenings could yield a reality alien on an increasingly fundamental level to our own. ? The precise and concrete time range in which they can take place can help bespeak of the culmination of many factors into a now-given of common known reality. ? But to begin to understand them must begin with basics of, say, scale and confluence. ? Actually, per the general mortal life in bloom, the more seminal are the more generally forgotten or now-elusive. ? Long spatiotemporally buried landmarks' transformations can have overlooked lingering effects on those of us breathing of the now.