terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Suboxc.txt ? Some may be more whole and direct than is generally noticed or acknowledged. ? For the mass spirit is imbued in such work in both spirit and concrete input. ? These all help clearly portray the various hues in the present tapestry. ? This can include the various general natures of input and the creators' relation to them. ? Likewise an acknowledgment in the creators' role in the implementation (or lack thereof) of their input is right. ? It is simply owed in the wake of their work that the masses of contributers to it, direct or indirect, be acknowledged en masse per the spirit of the project. ? Their pursuits, rightly directed, concretely contribute and shine in spirit beyond the various things they miss. ? Thus neither the specialist nor generalist are so disinterested. ? It may contribute, via initially individual inspiration that continues to spread secondhand, to the growing mass understanding of Lightform and the cause of being-as-such, and the mass determinability in their realization. ? Yet it may stand to achieve more. ? The total validity of the various minutiae is second to the soundness and clarity of the universal logic delivery. ? Not otherwise. ? If the principles outlined stand, The Work is worthy. ? But their work remains key. ? Such is the generalist's quandary. ? This extends to not just world perspective but also fineness of minutiae. ? The according striving helps inspire according striving by outsiders upon The Work. ? One can neither fully mortally escape their thought constraints or rightly embrace them. ? Yet the contribution of The Work as a piece to this enterprise with due awareness and humility is crucical. ? The Work may not be properly worldly. ? Care for beyond the ambit is necessary for The Work. ? One must strive to correct it. ? It is right to beware this. ? Another dilemma presents itself of the effort to extend beyond one's own blinding ambit and yet be bound by both mortal limit and the duty of knowing conviction to think within it. ? Here the various factors in the work's results can and must be drawn out, yet less conspicuously so to as to aid in the concision. ? The dilemma then becomes finding ways accordingly to condense the work into that which can communicate its essence without such being diluted, distracting, or mortally impossible through the inclusion of various minutae. ? It may even be strategically introduced at intervals to gather up all the parts into the clarity of a more encompassing pattern or principle. ? Here can it be made widely relatable and willfully sought after as familiar. ? Understanding of the whole or forgotten can be facilitated in part by reference to either in the terms of the contemporarily famiilar. ? Yet within this whole, matters can be revisited and somewhat repeated as motifs and mantras for important understanding. ? Such interpretations can attempt to grapple wholesale with the whole work, or otherwise select fragments even narrowly to the willful disregard of any other parts, for the journey that seems possible in what is thus far gathered. ? With this comes divergent interpretations of The Work. ? They must be at once both constantly current and rooted in perennial principles beyond present time. ? The ideas catch wider hold and beget further elaboration. ? Growing spirit impels it. ? Duty compels it. ? Ideas growing and spreading, they become entire seminal tomes. ? This power realized, it becomes stronger and more tangible, for we then realize our control. ? We recognize the limitations upon us of our own time, yet also the leeway of will found in the cracks of our fine contextual conditioning. ? Here we recognize alternatives, possibilities, agency, change, the role of beings at large, and the finer and more fluid detail of various pasts beyond the vale of nostalgist imposers and determinist posers. ? The unique struggles of subsets of the mass each form a piece of the puzzle in understanding this in all its ramifications, along their various lines of marginalization and their majority contribution to the construction of the world-as-known. ? We see an iron path to universal realization as well as the necessity of duty in its reaching. ? We see through the casting of emancipation's inevitability in the very over-deterministic thoughtform that's predicated against it in the first place. ? We stand against vaunted visionaries spanning even both sides of the Blightgeist who find us as cogs or chaff. ? Thus here we throw down a gauntlet. ? To apprehend the full principle is to apprehend its parts. ? But understanding and carrying out one's role and even birthright as wringer of broader principle from data helps liberate them from this. ? In it, we are cast as mere flotsam and jetsam on a greater tide of supposed greaters. ? It is dissembling, disorienting. ? The fatigue the propagandic data instills in just its mass alone is intentional. ? And ultimately data itself does not itself entail wisdom. ? Desperate mercenary careerism within the Blightgeist's institutions exacerbates this. ? Yet they're still adapted in favor of the long-term Blightgeistian message. ? These can be repackaged to new unknowing beings. ? They are "new" even as they are drawn from old tricks. ? Ironically these ideas are passed as both new and perennial. ? And with all this erasure comes a conflation of all history's tides into a meaningless amorphous slime (per another side of the Blightgeist, Saturation). ? By contrast, the tides of the mass are (if at all mentioned) minimized as mistaken interruptions. ? They are isolated and hailed for their role (real or not) in present mass-thieving systems. ? Only the most imperial and mercenary forces are upheld, and out of context, to justify similar present Blightgeistian measures. ? Its institutions are set in full force to propagate accordingly. ? This is especially so in omitting the role of the mass it resents in driving history itself. ? Where this is such, and all the more bullishly, it belies a fearful dishonesty. ? Their means are disingenuously cast as perennial. ? To this end erasure becomes an aim among the Blightgeist for purposes of bullishly hoarding. ? To create today, especially in more advanced forms, is necessarily to summon forth all accumulated prior thought acting upon it. ? Thus all staked claim to in the present is retrospective. ? Accordingly the past is a warground. ? Its various schools set us each about in our present. ? History diverges.