terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Shavock.txt ? This has a double consequence of both optics-myopia whereby these forms of address, being documented, are liable to later reach an audience from among beings-at-large less susceptible to this rhetoric and thus further incited against them (however universally rightly), and also a general myopia regarding history's actual motor forces as are found among the great mass. ? To this end, at different points and in different contexts the mass conditioning apparatus responsible for this history or timeline may by turns -- according to its present relation to the mass and in particular audience from the mass it currently seeks to address -- omit or justify the Blightgeist's own violence or exploitation and accordingly downplay the momentum of the mass, of beings-at-large. ? In this tradition, which to an extent valorizes itself purely qua tradition, the clung-to present conditions and norms set by an appendage of the Blightgeist are always perennial and therefore unassailable purely due to their supposed timelessness, even as those conditions inevitably change (whether by tide of sheer circumstance such as mass momentum or by deliberateness on part of key official agents) -- such as empire, obedience, and the construct of the territorialist faction itself. ? territorialist factions) these are done for within those manifestations so that the underlings kept in their sphere may believe it and accordingly abide by all the other dictates and norms within that cultural thoughtform. ? e. ? Nonetheless, while there are many thoughtforms (culturally prominent or not) competing for our attention and allegiance, there remains throughout the reign of the Blightgeist an overarching one that seeks to sanitize and justify its own actions at all times, and in the Blightegeist's many manfiestations (i. ? Furthermore, one is forced to acknowledge that without a base of understanding of the heretofore (as much as it incessantly grows and has accordningly many scrutinizing disciplines hurled at us from various points vying of our attention and credence) and the genuine urge to investigate, one could actually no more understand the nature of the reality meeting them today and daily anymore than they could likely make from scratch cutting-edge technology without reference to all the intergenerational knowledge converging on it. ? Overall though, these realities are united in the necessity to recognize the present perception as being borne of several (however unconsciously) inherited cultural accumulations even where the person in question does not know or perhaps deign to acknowledge, and to recognize therefore that even within the general consensus of chronology of events (which itself is still disputed, in some cases begrudgingly abided by for world-cultural facility, and in yet other cases opposed with entire rigorously established alternate systems endorsed by debatably reputable figures) one lives amidst a plurality of conflicting timelines concerning the general drift, import, and causal chain of history to date. ? For that matter, these thoughtforms themselves are weaponized in a battleground for each individual citizen's perception as well as that of the mass, and one must therefore take account of all the ongoing schemes in place for their compliance and belief. ? In order for one to grapple with the conceivable roots of things known and the history of peoples, one also has to grapple with the history of those histories as they bear on the present perception -- that is, how much their own perception is borne of the timeplace in which they are mired even as it seemingly includes the knowledge and viewpoints of currently culturally inherited thoughtforms.