terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - McFairk.txt ? Thus the purported “legacy” of institutions and the official configurations of territorialist factions rooted cannot be accepted, no matter the guise of “due procedure” or official “rights” of delineated institutions that the factions’ head agents may hide behind. ? The optimal resources entailed in the development of being would be accounted for in the society in question in which beings at large dwell. ? Yet its true prizing lies in only concern for the preservation of being-as-such, in its validity insofar as it is, with the allowance of the other states as being subservient to it; and accordingly it entails conditions that the Blightgeist refuses, such as help and care for the processing of developing being as it is and has become before extinguishment, and not the mercenary extraction of every process of being’s development and even very becoming, or the withholding of tribute and help for those tasked with its development. ? In the battle for being-as-such — first as a primordial principle, then as opposed to all opposed to it — respect for being-as-such is sometimes cloaked in the Blightgeist per its prizing of being-to-be, or being-as-potentiate, as well as being-as-was or being-as-extinguishing-resource; that is to say, it proffers itself in theory as being for being-as-such by proxy of its prizing of all the states (or rather non-states) entailed in it. ? That is, even those nominally considered to be of the faction (again along biogeophantasmic lines) are generally left behind or used as expendable decoys in the operation, as sacrifices. ? The circumstances bear witness to the actual intent, though these circumstances are often themselves obscured both in their carrying out and in their representation, since such representation is often the province of the same mass conditioning apparati that creates mass acceptance of the systemic brutality of the territorialist faction (not to mention the faction itself just in concept). ? For where coordinated attacks are carried out by a territorialist faction (let alone for it), it is almost assuredly obscured in its underlying intent by that intent’s nature — that is, it may be massly conditioned and then accepted (often along biogeophantasmic lines) as a proxy to an initial target while those monetarily or materially connected to the official target of the faction are covertly supported by that same faction. ? Here, “unity" itself may be unity under a ruler, unity under compulsion, and therefore actually not unity in essence. ? Similarly, though it is often denied that the formation of territorialist factions under the Blightgeist is done by depraved and ultimately pyrrhic-at-best coercion, it is along lines of blindspots of natures of relations that themselves are likewise predicated on carnage — for example, that such faction and its emerging official system was founded organically by communion of beings of a common (often emancipatory) goal. ? The farce of official “objectively conceived” key documents handing down as though by divine hand the supposed rightful enforcement of a key figure’s rule (often directly and singlehandedly) only serves to obscure this fact. ? That is, not recognizing the essence and principle whence perennial power are derived, it seeks its limited terrestrial counterpart ruthlessly, whether by overt or covert means as may appear most fruitful for it, and it accordingly views the world-as-known and its inhabitants purely in this scheme, each interaction interpreted accordingly as almost being a transaction or insidious power play in which the subject must always tarry in an imagined binary scheme of haves and have-nots. ? Yet by the same token the Blightgeist would have it that beings would become so initiated into the ways of it and that of the territorialist faction dwelled under in particular that one would ipso facto become its hypnotized adherent and defender, and by extension that the perpetual ruin of it and the allowances granted to beings at large would thereby be their own fault and the fault of loss of awareness and the phantom of civility on which public input supposedly pivots (this “public” being tacitly only recognized along biogeophantasmic lines). ? For the system in question may be the first of a rough category in known history; and it may also well be, especially past certain decisions as technically happen within the official bounds of the system set yet which affect them so greatly as to in practice jeopardize both its integrity and that of mass conditions, that one sub-section of the official system powers its way to great precedence over the others by the allowance of currency to comprise most official inputs in a nominal system of “choice”. ? The inherent covert nature of territorialist factions in their official tentacles behooves us to take account of what all such tentacles exist, and their role; namely, the possible connections (dependent on the faction) between the various halls of officiality and conditioning apparati, and the many formal covenants erected for the fulfillment of various little schemes beyond the general vale of the battle for hold of the faction and eventually the world-as-known (be it all ultimately under the Blightgeist).