terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Rehometaloos.txt ? This fate and its preservation is not only possible, but necessary. ? Besides which, many of the basic notions underpinning reflexive opposition to notions of mass tribute are the idea that only a combination fo compulsion and mercenary interest influences beings at large to any significant deed, ignoring at least in the meantime the questionability of the significance of deeds at large in the current operation of a society and of the contribution of the enforced patterns of compulsion on beings at large in their general lethargy and inability to contribute significant deeds — for there is precedent to suggest that those unfettered by such system fo compulsion, while perhaps indeed initially indolent from a process of recovery, ultimately find their willing path of deed and contribution by an alignment with their own strengths and inclinations. ? It behooves us, ultimately, to care. ? Besides which, we can, as of this writing, find historical precedent for the actual use of tribute for the most important purposes statistically and overall trackable well-being increasing. ? Ultimately, the meeting of provisional necessity where it pertains to survival (let alone thrival) of beings at large, such as concern basic corporeal maintenance, solidifies the validity of the concept of mass tribute as at least a provisional necessity unto itself by extension. ? It may also be hitherto unknown or ignored the ways in which extant conditions for tribute to and help of beings at large are beholden to procedural tedium. ? Moreover, a measure of masses tribute can ultimately inhere in those societies which are at least more technically inclined (if incompletely and with fault) towards the flourishing of beings at large if not as such, though they may come with a set of conditions couching it ultimately in the Blightgeist (for such is the case in the first place if it is a territorialist faction that adopts it). ? Yet it first bears mentioning that such mass tribute in many instances has historical precedent in a more modest and cloaked form, or proposed in mere predictive reaction (however prophetic relative to the consciousness of the general public) to a future supplanting of a current set of basic life knowns in the world-as-known by another (particularly as would involve beings’ collective creations) that would very immediately necessitate a compensating measure. ? Moreover, these means so expanded are feared to by that fact become less valued on a unit-by-unit basis and thus yield no more a fruitful situation than that which they were deployed to fix. ? Among the even potentially more well-natured and forgivable counterpoises to this principle are that it would likewise involve the tribute to all by all through the increased systemic maintenance of means and thus in a manner ultimately unfavorable to all, and that the mass maintenance (however held by compulsion) of means within this system would turn many involved against the principle in a way that would backfire - in effect, the math not adding up to the favored result. ? This constant established, even the system itself would be less procedurally and logistically bound to the maintenance of erstwhile inferior substitute systems for this mass tribute. ? Through this all could the conception, let alone selection, of viable roles within the bounds of the society be expanded freely and enterprised upon to great and unprecedented effect in that they are not bound by compromise for conditions of mere survival and the culturally enculturated notion of dignity attending them (which is really part of the wares of the Blightgeist). ? Yet a hint to its ultimate validity and eventual acceptability (for universal destiny is bound to the flourishing of the principles which such meantime provision represent and drives towards) lies partially in its effects within both the bounds of the system and according to the systemic, even cold and calculating criteria of validity which it holds to, such as attendance of institutions in which economy is produced and supposedly objective merits (often to the former end) are systematically measured (often against the will of subjects), andd the betterment of conditions and well-being of those who could be present to attend such institutions in the first place; which is largely a result not only of technical means afforded them, but the however tacit and subconsciously felt notion of a collective whole in which the single soul’s survival and thrival are borne in mind and unconditional. ? The challenge of this mass masses-tribute’s implementation lies partly in the fact that it may seldom be fully attempted in such a way that its objectively valid and possible potential benefits can blossom unfettered, let alone that the extant structural official system and according geographic thoughtform does not clash heavily with it in all their ramifications and thus undermine its aims not only in action but in the latter’s reception as an idea by many under the Blightgeist’s spell. ? A key component in the society aimed towards Lightform, if not Lightform itself, is compulsory tribute to and for all its inhabitants; ultimately in an instant, spontaneous manner, without systemic liaision, though the meantime reliance upon liaision is both necessary (however provisionally in the meantime) and of the ultimate principle in essence.