terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Backaxonnexiel.txt ? The tireless pretext of vigilance is ever one of the key eternal Trojan horses of Blightgeistian ventures, even if they are by certain sub-factions against others under the same umbrella. ? Moreover, they serve as a pretext for extant impulses of the non-bogeyfied faction's own expanding impulse, whose actual actions and effects will indeed extend well beyond the vigilant purposes they were used for. ? Territorialist factions within the Blightgeist, including the one outside of th particularly bogeyfied one under focus, are only able to conceive of combating such issues with systemic measures that, while technically or nominally harmful to the opposing key official agents and their according structural system (whether such is indeed the focus or not), primarily punish beings at large. ? The irony of parties caught within mass constricting intergenerational structural apparati meant to ensure their security is that they may not be able to join this out of world optics that would provoke immediate havoc upon them, thereby constraining them to provisional necessity for their own meantime survival if not seeming thrival (as was the case in the aforementioned negotiation), even though such havoc would indeed likewise (at least in theory) raise many allies in their favor. ? concerning sovereignty) must be systemically brutalized even from a territorialist outside. ? e. ? This impulse extends to the mentality, rightfully opposed by beings at large especially as inhabit the domain of the latter party, that beings at large revolting against systemic measures employed against them by their own key officials, even within the logical framework of territorialist factions as concept (i. ? The insatiable expanding impulse mentioned above, which is at the core the vain pyrrhic power-seizure fantasy at the heart of the Blightgeist especially in its Erosive element, reneges on promises to other parties that the latter may only agree to in the moment out of provisional necessity, such as concern agreements in which the latter must relinquish valuables or at least give the former party greater means to hurt or threaten them even as it is agreed for the time being that such will not happen. ? In essence, the inhabitants of the Blightgeist in the latter’s general structural components and thoughtforms recognize each other while not fully apprehending the entirety of the system in which they dwell. ? This mere opposition or (however nominal) contrast thereto passes for justice in the limited minds of the Blightgeistianly mass-conditioned, and likewise the legitimacy of the criticisms are ignored both out of mental association with the bogeyfied key icon or official and, more broadly, a lack of imagination and a neurotic clinging to the extant structural arrangement as known out of fear of the unfamiliar and the disruption of routine that would ensue upon its rightful dismantlement. ? Part of the tragicomedy of this is that it may (albeit for wrong reasons and to wrong ends) address legitimate threats to other official structural entities insofar as they have an increasing constricting stranglehold on mass structuring of the world-as-known, particularly along the lines of hollow pretexts to security. ? Besides that, the effects of such systemic atrocity could be not only more clear and direct as mass death, but moreover the systemic displacement of beings at large in the midst of a mass Blightgeistian thoughtform that rejects their housing and accommodation on grounds of a biological-geographical phantasm (that such thoughtform does not recognize as a phantasm), as well as predictable systemic retaliations that disrupt the economic balnace of the world-as-known. ? After all, in many such instances the faction in question will (often as a vehicle of its key official and icon dictating it) carry out atrocity on a wide and systemic basis for the purpose of cementing their own legacy as a formidable force, with any pretext added merely flimsy and post-hoc. ? It is looking in on the actions of one such territorialist faction, especially one which we in the culture of the faction in or under which we dwell have collectively long been conditioned to view as a bogey (according to phantasms of the latter’s present ideology that is at at best factually dated yet still in the historical rearview, and at any rate a misrepresentation of the ideology as the faction or bogey actually accords with it anyway), that we can admit this move as a logical fixture of territorialist factions, let alone one that is clearly for pernicious reasons. ? In this line of thinking, even the hollow temporary signal of peace or truce is a strategic means to securing the opposite via deceit. ? Much of this is instigated by territorialist factional competition to amass means of atrocity, the according habit ingrained across generations and especially in tandem with the mass conditioning of Blightgeistian thought. ? Moribund empires, being in line with Blightgeistian thought, are inwardly compelled upon certain thresholds to expand themselves.