terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Redfatusion.txt ? One is thereby obligated to study and heed such grievances in order to get a better understanding of how and why to cast their hand in the collective long-term effort to leverage the cause of being-as-such and beings at large. ? Where they are treated as chaff, so shall they react in kind, and their grievances are legitimate and legion. ? This is understandable where the supposed legacy of the key agent in question has lead to mass privation and cruelty on the mass structural level. ? However, in such instances the countering call of beings at large for the cause of being-as-such does not lie. ? The interests of beings at large not only is reduced to that within a chosen territorialist faction, but in particular a target demographic (which are also ultimately also the Blightgeist’s useful pawns), and further still the hoarding horde among them; such that the faction’s interests consist in that horde’s interest and apparent material gain. ? But Blightgeistian thought holds that key agents responsible for these conditions ought to be thanked, like benevolent lashers without whose lashing we would never know the light. ? This is a most formidable foe whose warning signs should be studied and heeded across contexts. ? The resulting further ingraining by the key agent of said defenders through more desperate provisional necessity into the by-then far-reduced set of means afforded them within the territorialist faction’s Blightgeistian sub-framework helps normalize and advance the mass privation that feeds into the above ignorance, to say nothing of the resulting death, backwardness, and indignity. ? This dichotomy established, the most brutality can be structurally and acceptably employed to cruelly squash any defenses by beings at large for the cause of themselves and being-as-such, and this is most employed by cowardly structural means. ? Means of creation already constricted by the Blightgeistian framework become decimated, thereby erasing the meeting of even provisional necessity in this framework so long as the aforementioned hoarding select few (centering naturally on the key agents who implemented the policy) stand to prosper (albeit not internally and fundamentally). ? Furthermore, the association of this seeming prosperity with “externalities” (which may be more to say secret intentions moreso than the clearly favored values) in the form of mass privation leads to positive association of the privation by proxy, if for no other reason than the mass ingrained stupidity of such privation being a sign of an indelible inherent defect. ? It is small wonder, then, that the key agents which stand by such atrocity would regard structural benevolence or the provisionally necessary violent conflict thereto as terror and even an opposition towards such interests. ? In fact, in Erosive logic, where notions of “prosperity” for a region (particularly a territorialist faction that the notion is gaining prominence in) hinge merely on the degree of material prosperity had regardless of distribution, context, or backstory to this gain, it is ignored the ways in which the measures employed to that end in fact sacrifice the prosperity of said region to a hoarding select few who are in the desperate pyramid of depraved mercenary aspiration in vain, in the process and by that fact eroding community in terms of both connectivity and the survival and thrival of being-subsets, along faultlines of recklessness by those who can afford it when those around them cannot. ? As such, the framing of opposition towards this conviction as necessarily entailing either its opposite and therefore a core vice, or the trivialization of opposition as itself “conviction" in a leveling of convictions in the universal balance to a marketplace of ideas whose validity depends upon the fleeting (and again often structurally and materially disproportioned and manipulated) context that selects it, is too disingenuous. ? In the operations and apologia for the Blightgeist, the mere status of conviction-as-such (even and especially where it may manifest as brutality) is proffered as principle, which aside from being hollow unto itself is generally a smokescreen for the ulterior motives which is said to be not only principle, but that which could not possibly not be principle by its pure status as brutally enforced conviction (however disingenuously ignoring the support of inherited conditions and structural-state power to be able to afford such supposed purity and not be steamrolled by those same implements) — and furthermore, the mere status (however nominal and in low proportion to an existing order it threatens) of interests being entrenched and thus “established”, “old”, “mainstreamed”, etc, does not imply total corruption in concept, let alone validate opposition thereto (which in many cases is really opposition to being-as-such first and foremost, camouflaged with the pretenses to the toppling of an elite order); especially where it may concern collectives and cooperatives formed for the furtherance of beings-at-large toiling within the imposed Blightgeistian framework of required and undercompensated labor for select hoarders, or the overhauling of an existent structural system (particularly within the constricting framework of a territorialist faction) to this end.