terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Upending as Pre-Necessity to Evolution Against Blightgeistian Conditioning Issues concerning the respect and treatment of being-as-such, particularly as subsets of it, can among its general (or generalized) oppressing factions be represented as a true reason for engagement therewith, whether due to optics in their quest for requisite wide approval and support of their stance or as a matter of self-convincing of the validity of the position for the present, familiar, and often (seemingly) favorable condition without which the holder’s universal-and-self-sense is threatened. Necessity and sovereignty concerning at-best tangential issues are the excuse for the perpetuation of such conditions, and often start as their very pretext with a likely dishonest initial limitation on the terms or degree of them; for that is part of what allows them to take root that they may develop and gain momentum which they otherwise could not. The growth of such conditions by generations, population, according transformation and intertwinement with other conditions, and increasing concernment of territorialist law (which is anyway only at-best provisionally valid and necessary by the entangling momentum of territorialist law across time and place, and its self-defeating chain of legal necessity) allows the conditions to rise by optics, familiarity, habit, generational knowing-none-other, etc., even where the supposed threatening of other conditions and of legal sovereignty threatens to upend the general structure on which a faction that is suppressive of being-as-such depends. Focus on this by them is disingenuous given that this being an upending relates inevitably to the conditions under focus that are predicated on the oppression of being-as-such; the affected subsets of being therewhich are the more denied or constricted concerning conditions or sovereignty. This upending of conditions even undermines the oppressing faction’s claims to inherent strength that undergirds their campaign against being-as-such, thereby further laying bare the hollow contradiction of The Erosive aspect. Still both key branches of the Blightgeist (Erosion and Saturation) can, by the distant (if now rather altered, sublated, or otherwise misframed deliberately by its entire mass-conditioning apparatus) aspect of known historical events that contribute to the present, disconnect the root events of a territorialist foundation from the culturally recognized atrocities it birthed by the very premise of its beginning and connect it instead to the latter's (seeming) solution or mere absence today. Wherever the Blightgeist admits to its wrongdoing, it is only in far retrospect and with calls of it being necessary or optimal for its time, or it being on its way out even (if not sooner) without the intervention by subjects or solved and solvable only by the Blightgeist. But see through and arise.