terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - "Realization Through Primordial Diplomacy" Within the universal bounds of thought the conscious global logic of beings shall itself be global in conception, and entail the establishment of natural collectives for the providence of resources to those most needing of such to thrive as beings-as-such, for this most ensures the long-term being of all conceivable parties; and indeed this collective-as-such shall be the primary conception in the first place, in which self and other are conceived of at once as to essentially be melted into this conception which then becomes (or rather always was and is rediscovered as) primordial, and which itself fuels negotiations between parties as to yield being beyond parties at all. Such negotiations themselves, by the in fact primordial and always accessible will which is summoned to constitute them qua negotiations, can and shall become themselves their own purpose for which the initial stated purpose of the negotiations was merely a pretext, a step whose arrangement in process towards ultimate thriving of beings is itself a form of greatness by its being a starting point of progress towards such divinity; and such is part of the logic of pipelines to divinity. The adoption of duty to this end in the civil (let alone global) domain as an official vocation can serve as a sublime signal of the fruitfulness of such duty-as-such to all beings both beyond officiality itself in the uniquely present steps of the progressive march to divinity and yet also primordial in essence and thus rediscoverable and redistributable from among the many points in the history of beings. In the further realization of such duty in official and common global vehicles of social action, parties most materially advantaged find their duty that is both universal according to beings-as-such and tentative in the party’s own widely proffered societal state and legacy; and the realization and acting upon this shall transcend itself and give further room for the remaining parties to realize their own duty and gifted flourishing according more to flourishing demonstration of their value as beings-as-such through and against struggles uniquely given them. Thoughts expressed through aforementioned official channels can by their wide broadcasting be widely seized upon by beings in mutual reverence for beings-as-such and re-harnessed with greater numbers of population and relations, as well as with greater diversity in perspective among such beings, with newly focused and yet also panoramic focus upon the various phenomena of different enclaves of beings and their underlying universal and being-based principles. Through this accumulated habit of manifestation as a means for negotiation, restoration, and augmentation of the primordial unity of being-as-such, the tentative unifying sentiments of parties of beings can be summoned from the depths almost as though in an entirely new discovery, with a renewed view towards the spreading of material flourishing as a manifestation of such inner collective will. Just as the accumulating will of beings yields vehicles of officiality through which to realize such ambitions, so too does the very fulfillment of officiality help to transcend it eo ipso, often in its use as a tentative step towards improved conditions. The rising of conditions partly through the will of beings, as well as the beings’ will itself, leads to both a forward movement and return towards primordial unity first and foremost beyond officiality. The dialectic of beings and parties towards this realization calls into account the challenges unique to each concerning self-recognition as a collective and the respective behooving duties towards the respect and flourishing of collective AS individuals, which is to say for being-as-such. Through beholding this, beings as individuals and collectives may become more conscious of roles, logistics, and mere presence of roles (particularly those official) of diplomacy of parties, and thus may conceive of themselves and of being itself largely as an unfolding process of diplomacy beyond even the general system that birthed those roles. Within this process, interfacing between parties itself with a view towards relieving or flourishing of beings, or of diplomacy, is itself more the process than its very pretext, and touches on the primordially optimal form of being interaction, other than a spontaneously artistic crafting and exploration of diplomacy. Within such afforded timeframes can the underlying principles of the pretext be more explored, drawn out, and realized through natural dialectic in a way that both sets foundations for and yet also transcends concrete steps towards the resolution between parties, often with the timeframe for the latter starting as pretext. They also further allow through dialectic the fully revealed context of inter-and-intra-party struggle that now, laid out in a schema and with the present real-time interaction of parties, enacts the primordial unifying principle as a concrete next step.