terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - "The Folly of Attempted Territorialist Power Seizures and Resource Leverages" Territorialist factions within The Blightgeist, which is essentially to say The Blightgeist itself, may use causes relating to being as such (though they may not so recognize it) as dressing for the leveraging of resources against another territory in such a way as to affect beings and bely its own enterprise against being as such — not only in how beings are affected, but in the way that the very allocation of resources towards that end by leaders of the territorialist faction belies the hoarding of them within a territorialist mental framework. The violations of beings by the territorialist faction’s nemesis (generally another territorialist faction) is mere pretext presented for public consumption, and only where it is discovered (actually or not); for said territorialist faction does by its very nature engage in much the same activity. By so doing it further entrenches and falsely legitimizes the dominant thoughtform of territorialism among beings of the world, but in the sense of the outside territory being against beings (if not against being as such, though the Blightgeist altogether only ever disingenuously opposes this, if it truly recognizes it at all) as Other and as opposed to the original territorialist faction’s conduct, rather than in the actual sense of a game of power seizures in which beings at large are the real target among both domestic and foreign territorialist factions and their leaders. All this is not to say whether the officially declared pretext for leveraging of resources in power seizures is legitimate; and in the meantime, general public thought is further molded and various institutions employed in these official deeds and functions remain at once both called attention to and further shrouded in the mystery that officiality tends to hold to. After all, direct and official targets of such official acts of power seizure and resource leverage are generally the least affected or at least the least wrongly affected, with any “damage” being only to their addictive avarice. Yet moreover, the action of the Other used as a pretext for such power seizure or resource leverage only further belies a key fault at the heart of the Blightgeist in avarice at all, which its institutions facilitate and are both responsible for and inadequate to address. Even the actions within the Blightgeistian framework that may address legitimate violations of beings in the actions of the Other can only by their nature serve to expand the power of the territorialist faction doing them. This further raises the question of when, how, and why the chain of inter-territorialist interactions as would even permit such power seizures or resource leverages started, and the actual consequences for beings at large (especially relative to those they were officially targeted against, assuming this is itself not mere dressing for an ongoing enterprise against being as such). That such factions may be opposed within the Blightgeist is but a feature of the latter itself, or the running of a depraved primordial power seizure venture that must endlessly feed on itself to continue, that can only win precisely by being at risk of losing. For that matter, it bears asking on the nature of the institutions employed at all, their respective roles in the state of global society or societies, and what of their actions constitutes which umbrella status in their own or each other’s terminology and evaluative systems. In any case, the territorialist acts of leverage within the Blightgeist gain their preemptive false legitimacy in the mere mention of violations of beings by the Other to whom the official act is targeted — violations of the practically exact nature of which the offending territorialist faction is committing, yet which to that very faction are merely harmful in how they affect its potential hoarded fortune. Moreover, the myopia of such territorialism in the committing of such acts against that Other, aside from the cultivation of the total inner void both within and globally that is inherent to the Blightgeist, lies in the provocation of beings at large within the targeted territory (if not also at large) by the imposition of harmful conditions — whether the bad actors believe they can evade the long-term consequences and reap abundant hollow meantime rewards, or not. The actual issues at hand against beings at large from those within the targeted territory (namely its territorialist faction leaders) remain unaddressed by the very offending faction that uses them by and large as a pretext for its own actions against it (which mainly affect beings at large). Where the beings at large are provenly affected, territorialist factions of the Blightgeist propagandize via the pitting of beings as subsets against each other that this is inevitable or deserved by the Blightgeist’s own determinist logic against being as such that pretends to favor the target subset that it most officially recognizes within its own territorialist framework, yet which it only technically does so relative to the Other specified; or otherwise points to it as proof of the supposed illegitimacy of systemic Other territories qua Other so as to gain compliance for the present territorialist system in all its warts.