terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Hetchile.txt ? We recognize the limitations upon us of our own time, yet also the leeway of will found in the cracks of our fine contextual conditioning. ? And ultimately data itself does not itself entail wisdom. ? Growing spirit impels it. ? It is simply owed in the wake of their work that the masses of contributers to it, direct or indirect, be acknowledged en masse per the spirit of the project. ? Its various schools set us each about in our present. ? These can be repackaged to new unknowing beings. ? It is right to beware this. ? Their means are disingenuously cast as perennial. ? This extends to not just world perspective but also fineness of minutiae. ? Thus here we throw down a gauntlet. ? We see an iron path to universal realization as well as the necessity of duty in its reaching. ? The according striving helps inspire according striving by outsiders upon The Work. ? Where this is such, and all the more bullishly, it belies a fearful dishonesty. ? To this end erasure becomes an aim among the Blightgeist for purposes of bullishly hoarding. ? Here we recognize alternatives, possibilities, agency, change, the role of beings at large, and the finer and more fluid detail of various pasts beyond the vale of nostalgist imposers and determinist posers. ? Its institutions are set in full force to propagate accordingly. ? The Work may not be properly worldly. ? Another dilemma presents itself of the effort to extend beyond one's own blinding ambit and yet be bound by both mortal limit and the duty of knowing conviction to think within it. ? Yet it may stand to achieve more. ? This can include the various general natures of input and the creators' relation to them. ? By contrast, the tides of the mass are (if at all mentioned) minimized as mistaken interruptions. ? One can neither fully mortally escape their thought constraints or rightly embrace them. ? Some may be more whole and direct than is generally noticed or acknowledged. ? Likewise an acknowledgment in the creators' role in the implementation (or lack thereof) of their input is right. ? History diverges. ? Yet they're still adapted in favor of the long-term Blightgeistian message. ? But their work remains key. ? They must be at once both constantly current and rooted in perennial principles beyond present time. ? But understanding and carrying out one's role and even birthright as wringer of broader principle from data helps liberate them from this. ? Care for beyond the ambit is necessary for The Work. ? Duty compels it. ? The dilemma then becomes finding ways accordingly to condense the work into that which can communicate its essence without such being diluted, distracting, or mortally impossible through the inclusion of various minutae. ? To create today, especially in more advanced forms, is necessarily to summon forth all accumulated prior thought acting upon it. ? They are isolated and hailed for their role (real or not) in present mass-thieving systems. ? Here the various factors in the work's results can and must be drawn out, yet less conspicuously so to as to aid in the concision. ? It is dissembling, disorienting. ? Yet within this whole, matters can be revisited and somewhat repeated as motifs and mantras for important understanding. ? In it, we are cast as mere flotsam and jetsam on a greater tide of supposed greaters. ? The ideas catch wider hold and beget further elaboration. ? It may even be strategically introduced at intervals to gather up all the parts into the clarity of a more encompassing pattern or principle. ? We see through the casting of emancipation's inevitability in the very over-deterministic thoughtform that's predicated against it in the first place. ? The total validity of the various minutiae is second to the soundness and clarity of the universal logic delivery. ? Thus all staked claim to in the present is retrospective. ? Only the most imperial and mercenary forces are upheld, and out of context, to justify similar present Blightgeistian measures. ? This is especially so in omitting the role of the mass it resents in driving history itself. ? We stand against vaunted visionaries spanning even both sides of the Blightgeist who find us as cogs or chaff. ? Accordingly the past is a warground. ? Yet the contribution of The Work as a piece to this enterprise with due awareness and humility is crucical. ? Such is the generalist's quandary. ? To apprehend the full principle is to apprehend its parts. ? Such interpretations can attempt to grapple wholesale with the whole work, or otherwise select fragments even narrowly to the willful disregard of any other parts, for the journey that seems possible in what is thus far gathered. ? Ironically these ideas are passed as both new and perennial. ? Desperate mercenary careerism within the Blightgeist's institutions exacerbates this. ? Thus neither the specialist nor generalist are so disinterested. ? It may contribute, via initially individual inspiration that continues to spread secondhand, to the growing mass understanding of Lightform and the cause of being-as-such, and the mass determinability in their realization. ? Their pursuits, rightly directed, concretely contribute and shine in spirit beyond the various things they miss. ? They are "new" even as they are drawn from old tricks. ? Here can it be made widely relatable and willfully sought after as familiar. ? For the mass spirit is imbued in such work in both spirit and concrete input. ? Ideas growing and spreading, they become entire seminal tomes. ? One must strive to correct it. ? The fatigue the propagandic data instills in just its mass alone is intentional. ? Not otherwise. ? These all help clearly portray the various hues in the present tapestry. ? With this comes divergent interpretations of The Work. ? This power realized, it becomes stronger and more tangible, for we then realize our control. ? Understanding of the whole or forgotten can be facilitated in part by reference to either in the terms of the contemporarily famiilar. ? If the principles outlined stand, The Work is worthy. ? And with all this erasure comes a conflation of all history's tides into a meaningless amorphous slime (per another side of the Blightgeist, Saturation). ? The unique struggles of subsets of the mass each form a piece of the puzzle in understanding this in all its ramifications, along their various lines of marginalization and their majority contribution to the construction of the world-as-known.