NEFX - Usectair.txt ? They show the blindspots of transparency and accountability in the wasting of life in the pursuit of mercenary or cudgeling ends under the Blightgeist. ? The stories and demands all coalesce in mass might (by brute strength and actual universal principle) around a more clear and concrete means (however temporary) of supplanting the present hegemony. ? But the naked truth of such instances re-litigates long histories. ? The ones endlessly pursuing justice for the past instasnces gather and accumulate for each new instance. ? For many such atrocities hide behind the veil of accidents for what is in any case a systemically pardoned action. ? They strive harder. ? The names ring. ? This is in part for that the offenders in past instances may still run amok unabated, wreaking further atrocity. ? No more harming. ? And beyond such stories are the newly once untold ones. ? Such spirit may be convened by members of the mass most poignantly on the scene at which such instance occurred and bring to light the name and presence of an organization based in such battle. ? Along the way to Lightform, according losses form blocks to eventual success. ? Enough becomes enough. ? It is recognizing a new form or level of emancipation to be had from within the confines of that once acceptedly cast as such. ? They blend with the known to form a voice. ? Though those involved may hate to have to do so again and again, the duty of justice gives no choice in the proactive conscience. ? from halls of officiality) of the Blightgeist exacerbates this, perhaps even secretly knowingly. ? In such instances a (sometimes third party) mere passive maintenance of status quo from a structurally powerful being from one particular tentacle (i. ? They bring to light how current relatively ancient similar instances are as alive with the more current one under focus, and come with demands. ? No more secrecy hiding behind the plausible deniability of official duty within the Blightgeist. ? The voice is emancipontology. ? Sometimes unsuccessfully. ? Atrocity in its naked beholdable imagery is a formidable (if pyrrhic and rightly avoidable) teacher. ? It is simply that principle demands the success sooner and without the further loss that brings such strength. ? They reinforce an at best apathy on part of the system towards mass need to the point of active blockage of the latter. ? They also further reveal the ultimate lack of commitment to universal principle averred to be the province of the official system in question, hidden behind the often unconscious bias of biogeophantasms among their mass conditioned subjects (their masses). ? Individual and current instances of systemic atrocity do by principle, necessity, and duty light up the communal spirit for being-as-such and against the atrocity in both principle and history. ? A voice bellowing for support once withheld. ? Yet it is paradoxically only chaff (if there be such a thing sentiently) which thinks in such terms. ? Their snuffing amplifying them. ? The common experience and principle being at once articulated and realized, communal control of means becomes more visibly possible and necessary. ? Yet with this the whole cause gets stronger and unavoidable. ? e. ? From geopolitical convenience will thousands be considered chaff. ? The ubiquity of the systemic atrocity becomes more clear. ? The circumstances can and must be tracked to assess the current Blightgeistian tentacles' believed reach, such as atrocity against those protesting its very growth and expansion. ? These too bear lurid details. ? And this becomes important as atrocities reaching long into an age of mass normalization and desensitization thereto are made almost secretly more severe accordingly. ? No more killing.