terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Sacrostly.txt ? But it is only being-as-such that should be the ultimate aim of any such sounding, and this can and must guide beings in the structuring of their daily goings and event horizons. ? Meanwhile, practically opposed yet ultimately legion other agents of the Blightgeist holdfast to continued and perpetual systematic atrocity for the ways in which it not only internally justifies their continued chosen pursuits and professions but gives more opportunity for the shrouding of Erosive aims such as atrocity in the vague abstractions of principles in favor of being-as-such through a territorialist bogey (generally along biological-geographical lines); and they may trumpet to this end before such an official branch as a committee for aggressive force with an established official foothold within a territorialist system that the trumpeter is home to. ? Therefore, ultimately, optics-clutching official half-measures nominally in the name of beings at large or being-as-such are for the purpose of the opposite end, both in their final effect and in the meanwhile deceptive conditioning apparatus; and this is already made clear in the willful ignorance of systematic atrocity in a meantime "ally" (or what is really a temporarily useful set of beings destined per Blightgeistian thoughtform for eventual conflict) territorialist faction. ? Systemically and circumstantially engineered and enforced privation of any kind is a means for agents of the Blightgeist to maintain plausible deniability about the extent of their atrocity in both intent and practice, as well as a subtler and strategic form of devourment. ? Actually, those of Blightgeistian conditioning are in many cases somewhat inchoately aware of this and are spared the “burden" of sight and mind, with the perceived “absolute and ethical” systemic territorial boundaries at once held brutalistically by a cudgeling class of Erosive thoughtform and also becoming in common thought the vaguely abstracted area to which to leave to the business of such cudgeling class falsely conceived as universal — in effect creating a mental cage (or rather strengthening and further enclosing the one spawned by the Blightgeist itself in all its conditioning power). ? Such systematic atrocity may even take so much as the form of hoarding or withholding, aware of yet heedless of the resulting material-and-otherwise-conditional complications for beings-at-large as may dwell in the affected location and be so circumstantially bound to it by inter-generational effect — but the science of spaces for beings is such that, pending sufficient comprehension of Lightform beyond Blightgeistian conditioning, the magnitude of such atrocity is seldom seen, let alone absorbed and felt. ? The actual battles for beings at large and in the spirit of being-as-such, be they often so motivated by a rash anger, transcend these notions by the mere ways in which they are a semi-pre-emptive defensive insurgent reaction against systemic atrocity over time that targets (or simply involving) those uninvolved in the (at least official) Blightgeistian scheme of power-seizure, though in point of fact the ultimate Blightgeistian enterprise targets these first and foremost out of an inner void and resulting compulsive punishing impulse. ? In any case, even in the purest of intentions regarding these measures, the material and logistical reality of the brutalistic measures (especially those official) can only serve yet other agents of the Blightgeist (be it in a technically opposed party along lines of territorialist factions) in a way that gains public visage through eventual technical official “settling of the dust of battle” even as it trounces beings at large. ? In fact, the very same vague abstraction regarding protection of beings at large and being-as-such as the responsible Blightgeistian agents in question may invoke can be invoked yet again not only to support the opposite later measure, but to couch or cloak it in the invocation of terms amiable to those lofty concepts, such as defense of “sovereignty”. ? This half-measure, insofar as it is actual, accomplishes at once the symbolic victory of the gesture taken by a Blightgeistian agent or more (in part as a means of further conditioning in, and thus loyalty from, supporting beings) while leaving room for more of the addressed atrocity to continue if not recover, to say nothing of that of the figurative knife which remains indefinitely not retracted. ? Any so much as merely promised concrete measures to this end, foregoing in the meantime any actual practical logistical issues as may arise from the same system that lead to atrocity in the first place (be it largely the support of direct atrocity by another party), may consist purely in the reduction of concrete support and thus in essence the mere partial retraction of a plunged knife. ? Blightgeistian thoughtform cannot help but only ever nominally address and proclaim to combat threats to beings at large and being-as-such via the lens of a territorialist bogey, which essence contradicts and reveals the lie of such proclamation.