terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Eansed.txt ? It also lays bare that the Blightgeist’s Erosive aspect's prizing of being-as-potentiate as being the utmost of protection of vulnerability elides the ways in which it commits daily and long-term atrocity on so much as a systematic scale on the very being-subsets it identifies being-as-potentiate with. ? Ultimately, the predication of these atrocities against being-as-such means inevitably that areas more subject to it are those less able by extant material conditions to report on this. ? The couching of the conception of atrocity in this according to conditioning by territorialist factions (and by proxy the Blightgeist) means that the aggregate atrocity by the “necessary” and “pre-emptive” faction is elided until the point at which their disengagement appears to yield atrocity by yet another party whose rise and maintenance across generations was precipitated by historical atrocities by the first territorialist faction. ? Otherwise, this bare atrocity is seen as a prerequisite for the prevention of greater atrocity among a greater number even as the Blightgeistian enterprise is predicated against beings at large by proxy of its thoughtform against being-as-such, and even as this greater atrocity could arise yet does not and is at any rate never concretely provable, only pointed to in its non-happening as correlating. ? The broader project is against being-as-such, which in its fullest and most honest presentation considers this the prerequisite to actual ultimate emancipation along lines of being-as-subset — the idea being that ultimate emancipation is only attained insofar as the most possible emancipation can be maintained by a select few beings that still require external circumstances in order to fulfill it and thus depend on the general extermination and subjugation of beings-at-large (particularly as subsets) for the sake of this attainment. ? The reduction even in mere basic technical conditions for the experience of the grasp of emancipation that the responsible territorialist faction (or at least faction's agent) propagates gives the lie to this conception in the first place. ? across phantasmic lines of territorialist factions and more specifically biological-geographical notions, brushed off with such official optics moves as impotent apologies. ? e. ? It also lays bare the calculus by which the elimination of being is pathologized and officially sanctioned, i. ? It lays bare the inherent folly of the Blightgeistian project mainly in its Erosive aspect, and in particular in the spontaneous paranoid pre-emptive striking that makes at least as many enemies and depraved world-as-known conditions as it defeats (be this subconsciously part of the Blightgeist's pathological pyrrhic self-defeating aim). ? in the ending or serious harm of beings involved in aid and the serving of being-as-such). ? e. ? Even then it takes the generally disregarded or covered investigations and expression of underground information channels to disseminate the truth of an act or event, which is then only seen by those with the mind to even search and transcend the hold of officially sanctioned channels of information by the Blightgeist (i. ? Moreover, the discovery or uncovering of the actuality of an atrocity committed on the geopolitical stage within the Blightgeistian framework (which generally goes hand n hand with it for it to even happen in the first place) after a period allows for this actuality to generally go unnoticed and yet present the visage of truth, which in turns gains public visage through Blightgeistian conditioning by the mere admittance of what is done (a barometer of the degree of existing structural power), the technical accomplishment of a goal, and the vague allusion to good intentions in a broader scheme that centers atrocity in itself as not being itself but instead being the prerequisite to whatever idealized (usually territorially grounded) conception of emancipation is dominant [note the lore of Kabul]. ? To this end, “accidents" can be justified which were in fact deliberate and at least an inevitable side effect (if not a very party) of the thoughtform of the Blightgeist, passed off as merely an inevitable side effect of the aforementioned backdrop presented as “necessity" or “inevitability”. ? Here spontaneous atrocity can occur frequently in a way that with remoteness and regularity seems mundane to many of the conditioned. ? By setting the backdrop of eternal carnage-ridden strife on the stage of the world-as-known, The Blightgeist can absolve any casualty, mishap, or otherwise brazen wasteful measure against being-subsets, beings at large, or being-as-such (and in deed an affront on one is generally an affront against all, at least when conducted by the Blightgeist) with technical historical progress regarding concrete methods, and through a veil of secrecy seldom penetrated especially as regards the many different branches for different geopolitical operations by a territorialist faction [note the lore of CENTCOM].