NEFX - Bences.txt ? It arguably takes the tracing back of both the genesis of such processes and the collective consciousness of the importance of being-as-such in order to transcend these systemic shackles. ? Specifically, the aspect of some of the aforementioned rulership determination processes more serving of being-as-such further entrenches official procedure and prospective rulers’ catering of ideas to that end. ? Moreover, the advocation and engagement of such a system (or, perhaps more to the point, subsystem, one which may be called a subsystem of compromise), whether out of understanding of its provisional necessity or of a Saturative lack of imagination for anything better beyond the overall Blightgeist itself (for the Blightgeist is not fully recognized in all its ramifications), both entrenches it as the ultimate conceivable option to beings at large (particularly out of their desperation) and serves by its shortcomings and according consequences (be they the most preferable within the Blightgeistian framework) as justification by Erosion for further entrenchment of the Blightgeist at large (mainly in its Erosive aspect). ? The existence and provisional necessity of such a system within the iron grip of the Blightgeistian framework across generations goes to show the paradox of the Blightgeist in that systems must be adopted within it to better serve beings at large and being as such even as doing so at least does not thwart the Blightgeistian framework and possibly even serves it, though it be in the service of a more immediate need of beings and of overall provisional necessity. ? However, at the core the territorialist domain in question much at large hold to such universal principle before their decided methodology even when the latter is more often in favor of being as such; and indeed, the technical foundations of such systems may have root in a scheme in the opposite direction. ? For that matter, those slated for position under such a system are less beholden to such widely generalized and dispersed traits (particularly under Blightgeistian conditioning) as to merely barely satisfy beings at large within a territoriality domain’s population rather than confidently strive and attain to the core needs and spirit of it as a collective. ? Such particular system is the more true in principle to such an aim as an end in itself, and is thus more respectful of being at large and (possibly by proxy) being as such. ? Specifically, the quantity may need to be greater than that of all other determined options combined, rather than each individually, so as to more definitively determine the will of a territorialist domain’s decided deciders. ? In the latter such case, determination is more conditional and circumstantial, and thus according sub-processes are more necessary and common, such as for beings and operations in the legislating or executing domains. ? In particular, these processes’ results may depend more purely on quantity of counted units in determination, or according to a benchmark threshold of quantity, in particular who or what attains to such a benchmark FIRST. ? The selection of such a process may depend largely on the circumstances which give rise to them, which may later down the line merely be followed out of custom or habit, in effect being a “grandfathered” plan; and the science of such circumstances and reactions thereto, as well as of the particular rulership determination processes invented and selected, their purpose, and their rationale, also needs to be investigated and peeled back like an onion, that we may see the underlying mechanics of the times and places in which we dwell. ? Rulership determination processes among beings, even within certain determinate categories as are customarily followed within territorialist domains, tend to have many sub-processes or derivative processes, whether deliberately in every iteration or depending on the circumstance — and indeed, there are instances where circumstantial sub-processes happen within both inherent sub-processes and in the long-form of the broader territorial process itself, such as for those processes of narrowing down the range of possible beings or circumstances of the eventual rulership or of determining the final selected beings or circumstances from that narrowed-down pool of possibilities. ? In comprehension and contemplation of the affairs of beings, especially as regards processes and structures for rulership (be they necessary or not, and in any case pending the dawn of Lightform as transcending limited mortal affairs and the Blightgeist in particular), the various existing general modes of such processes and structures bear examination — and in particular, many of such processes that are purely corollary or derivative ones of key or parent ones, in such a way way as to gain the label and overall visage of a process unto themselves, as when a second process is carried out in determining of rulership due to the systematically unsatisfactory results of the first.