117: NEFX - Impins

terminal 0

unfinished

From the archives

NEFX - Awleng.txt ? Agents within this logical framework are their own worst enemy. ? What’s more, covert infilitration of the informing party into the midst of the primary bogey of the initiating party invites itself return covert infiltration, for prolonged infiltration stands to be discovered, and is itself better combated through covert means — and this undermines the initiating party's very plan of power-seizure (publically propagated as “security”, which at its core Blightgeist is opposed anyway to except for the designated “blessed” being-subset of whatever territorialist faction under the conditioning of the Blightgeist — and this generally passes muster where there remains a seemingly demographically uniform and “chosen” population of beings within the territoriality faction). ? Here, appeals to subconsciously phallic causes for tantrums as gaps in weaponry resources are made as years drag on (especially beyond a specific war). ? This sort of fiction becomes an ongoing necessity for both continued power-seizing abilities and even basic survival of the informing party, since it ingratiates said informing party to the initiating party in the justified use of excessive martial power. ? To this end, the greater bogey under focus for the initiating party must be made to seem ever more threatening by the informing party. ? On some level, despite the somewhat thoughtless, “headless” logic of the Blightgeist, there is an (however subconscious and slowly inter-generationally accumulated) awareness among its agents of the pyrrhicness of their enterprise that is nonetheless stuck to out of a fundamentally depraved wager against being-as-such and the basis of being in the ever-insatiable devouring of being, for which even the most ultimately pyrrhic actions (as indeed such actions cannot but ultimately be) must always be carried out and (at least for the moment) ignored or distracted from. ? Moreover, reliance on such forces of their own respective territorialist and brutalistic logic leaves the trusting party open to their vagaries, developments, and threats; and since the latter (at least in the earlier stages of alliance) is also beholden to the initiating and now trusting party, they are the more obligated to themselves out of survival to lie and exaggerate their gatherings and contributions in order to avoid punishment. ? Though these scheming beings are useful to the whole enterprise, they themselves are able (as further enabled by such alliance) to create domino effects of domination within their domains of control whose reverberating effects are both felt later by the initiating party and yet to a degree are so engineered by them in order to sustain their pyrrhic power-seizing machine (as shown by the Six-Augsburg-Barbie-Bolschwing-Skorzeny nexus). ? The public framing of such allies as enemies according to the established territorialist logic of the Blightgeist elides the ways in which the true (if provisional, short-lived, begrudging, and given to the inevitably inter-conflicting thirsts of territorialist logic under the logic of the Blightgeist) alliance is between territorialists for their own respective schemes, with those who’ve amassed strongholds of advantage in enemy territory becoming invaluable (regardless of their own actual conduct, particularly as leading them to such action and thus calling into question the value of such operations in the first place) to the power-lusting schemes of Blightgeistian agents. ? This is seen in such things as the OSS-Paperclip-CIA pipeline — and here too in retrospect we can see how the bogeys (whether of the time or in later historical retrospect for amnesiac legitimization of current power structures) of a particular territorialist faction are secretly befriended and leveraged for use against an even larger bogey, even at the cost of dignity and conditions of beings by the hands of themselves and the same initial bogey with which they have allied. ? What’s more, the leveraging of structural power by Blightgeistian branches coordinating such geopolitical operations to employ such peripheral grand instatetions not only inducts itself into the pantheon of total being control, but also sets ghastly and fear-reaching trends, which may even outpace later (however half-hearted) attempts at scaling back the reach and aims of Blightgeistian institutions. ? In geopolitical operations for planned eventual absolute illegitimate power seizure, some of the biggest institutions are employed largely by appeal to seeming common interest that is nonetheless approached approached somewhat divergently between the parties, yet which further entrenches such institutions (or what is to say, their essence that they may be a distortion of in part by their nature as the largest institutions of present beings) in their conception, expression, and finally (in keeping with their present nature) enforcement of universal principle as and through dogma and brutalist coercion thereto.

Logging off...