terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Cration.txt ? That its operations are so tied to power, and widely noticed and marked out accordingly by beings at large across several incarnations, only further points to beings’ duty to at least question if not fully supplant said arm in operation and in notion. ? What is initially ancillary to or only lightly (whether by intention or not) engaged with in the arm’s initial incarnation takes over as the point. ? The initial assignment of key roles in such institutions to those already feverish with imperialist and warfaring thirst, be that incidental to the actual decision to assign them, only exacerbates this, and can mark a key early turning point that further sets the tone for the arm and (by response) geopolitical trends in general, affecting swaths of lives. ? Such arms have their own prototypes and seemingly initially provisional incarnations that (however subconsciously) grow to bigger and darker entities as they feed into the logic of the Blightgeist (as seen with the Office of Coordinator of Information (COI) leading into the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) leading into the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)). ? But we can learn from the cultural logic journey of territories towards the establishment of such arms according to some notion (possibly even innocent in some ways) of provisional necessity such as the gathering of information for the sake of defense, which underhanded methods therefor such as covert code-breaking nonetheless violate the principles sociality and tact that the offending territorialist culture (however nominally and with blindspots concerning certain beings and being-subsets) has committed to; and these small steps lead to both means and temptation for the Blightgeistian agents’ endless appetite for coercion, as well as geopolitical folly as such operations are found out and stoke further fires and (given the limited and myopic territorialist logic of all territories under the Blightgeist) inspire other territories’ creation of similar imperialist and brutalist arms. ? In fact, this is only a hollow pretext — the imperialist or brutalist arm in question is beyond reform or universal respect and must be done away with, if not notions of such imperialist arms even according to the logic of provisional necessity. ? Furthermore, within such attempted self-justifying logic, this imperialist arm of the Blightgeist in question gains its seeming public legitimacy by its nominal establishment in the name of some other function, such as the gathering of information; such that the function is made to appear as not only relying on the far reach and power of officiality and state power in order to be carried out most effectively and for its needs to be most met, but as necessarily entailing such atrocity, if not somehow by association proving to need such atrocity in order to be accomplished, and which rewards (real or fabricated) are considered to be worth it all. ? The question becomes how to surpass the stronghold of such logic and according conditions across all known domains of being in the formation of a system for being-as-such that is not so vulnerable to the atrocity of the Blightgeist, being by its own gentler nature less accustomed to such atrocity. ? The irony of this is that in desiring (if not seemingly needing to itself) to create stronger territorialist branches of the Blightgeist, the manipulating party in this Blightgeistian enterprises becomes that much more threatened itself, and is less able to successfully overthrow the monster it has created than it is to overthrow that which its monster replaced. ? What’s more, beyond the logistics and technical concerns of procuring lusted-for absolute dependent power by all these involved parties of atrocity, pride and the underlying lust itself is at stake, which are threatened by such and thus must ever be tended to with escalated atrocity for which they then publicly invoke the ever-worn mantras of “liberty” and the apparently ever-present threat thereto (which is ultimately what Blightgeistian conception of liberty often amounts to) to maintain public favor for — for otherwise the “threatened” party feels impotent. ? The ruling Blightgeistian agent’s power and desire therefor grow beyond the very means that procured it for them, and its own subservients can then be weaponized against it (if only out of coercion and fear, which they themselves take out on beings at large in the carrying out of cudgelers’ logic and duties) — and all this perhaps ironically in spite of coercion even originally being used against said ruling agent. ? Part of the pyrrhicness of Blightgeistian enterprise, especially as it pertains to imperialist and otherwise coercive and invasive measures, is that those it trains and grooms in its own ways for long-term geopolitical gain will, by employing the same Blightgeistian measures domestically (or, what is to say, territorially within their established territorial domain), inevitably by nature of such measures contradict and conflict with those of the manipulating territorialist faction (or, what is to say, imperialists) in question; and this is often from the expertise gained in managing a cudgeler class over time, and the territorialist domain based on the logic and actions of such class (such as seen in the case of Hussein, Noriega, the Shah of Iran, etc).