terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Reproffectorks.txt ? This, coupled with vague token references to the surroundings the subject may find themselves mired in, can help appear to personalize and make "human" (or more broadly sentient) the entire scheme at play, and to identify these patterns is to see behind many of the given veils. ? These various portrayed possibilities, dropped at once as though a bomb such as they would themselves literally drop on the masses, can help further mentally funnel the subject into immediate and desperate compliance. ? For that matter, any mass conditioned fear that the agent may identify in the masses could be portrayed as necessitating the same system out of a need to quell it and ensure safety. ? Further still, the manipulating agent may cop to an awareness of this to a degree yet (in part due to by their very temperament not fully understanding it) deflecting this fear as being largely instigated by the vague portrayed threat that supposedly necessitates the system in place and its many tentacles. ? known daily and existential routine). ? e. ? To this point, stated problems and events supposedly necessitating the subject's continued action can be portrayed in such a way as to legitimize extant institutions and power structures such as the agent may hail from as being of absolute necessity in the moment, appealing to the reflexive tendencies of fear and the ways in which it can drive one to accept monstrous injustice and constriction in the name of perceived survival, thrival, or safety even in just the abstract (i. ? Yet here still these redundant calls require sustenance of credibility by the giving of new and evolving details and context, which yet further betrays the general degree of secrecy and duplicity on part of both the manipulating agent and the party which they hail from and dictate on behalf of. ? There must always be a simultaneous utmost urgency and seeming quick solvability, a constant dangling of bait that is not quite sated or satable in the near future -- and indeed, this lack of near future of the end but nonetheless of a meanwhile series of completable tasks on the road to the ultimate accomplishment put forth is part of what can drive the manipulated subject. ? Overall, at each step of the process of manipulation and the completion of the task it is for, these same aforementioned rhetorical techniques must be employed time and time again in relation to the at least supposed stage of the task's completion. ? This is aided by both the token portrayal of help and humane tenderness in the form of allies or fellow innocents, and the providing of information crucial in the moment of immersion in the task to both the task itself and the subject's survival. ? But along with the aforementioned techniques, the agent can here appeal also not just to the present urgency but its proximate solution in time or place -- and convincing one of a cause, let alone its urgency, can be slyly accomplished against any lingering doubt by the positing of at least part of its solution as being so proximate, as being both of dire importance and easy simplicity. ? This, naturally, gives the lie to the massly culturally conditioned notion of the thing (generally a system leader, figurehead, cause, etc) being inherently of utmost strength and praiseworthiness, even by supposed biology or divine right, yet which relies on the nominally weaker in order to thrive if not outright survive. ? However, to be successful (as has historically been borne out), the manipulating agent can still draw this back to a narrative of necessary and urgent progress that is both more desperately calling to the subject and yet more salved by their compliance thus far at the same time. ? in an explanation of the former fact, that are then not revealed, as the manipulating agent -- and, perhaps by extension, the system they hail from and for -- further pulls back to reveal the web of infelicities and contradictions in which they are mired, should the subject have not only the eyes but the foresight to see (such as may be given in these writings). ? e. ? This sort of technique can even extend to the admittance of a fact that entail the hinting towards others, i. ? This dissonance between what is revealed and what is quite conspicuously not revealed and is even outright hidden may be buttressed by the same air of allyship and shared history, as though to personalize and render as tender and humane the brutal and transactional nature of the agent-subject interaction. ? the maintenance of such system requiring constant upkeep and underlings by an ingrained dependency on these things, or even just appeasing those who outrank them in the system for their own safety) forces them into this awkward, revealing, paradoxical, and jeopardizingly revealing quandary. ? e. ? In the running or serving of illegitimate systems and power seizing operations, the manipulating agent is at once beholden to both delegating tasks for a supposed key importance and quite glaringly withholding information or explanation on it to those the agent has tasked, for the seeming provisional necessity of their position (i.