terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Heavagections.txt ? This begins with an understanding of the problems that may be faced by beings at large. ? That is, to understand the true nature of the cost of such constant and somewhat spontaneous mass tribute, it helps to understand what already-existent prices they are an answer to and which they would essentially replace; that is, what the overarching notion, policy, etc, is, such as would concern edification, care, civic maintenance, and the toppling of forces and institutions thereto opposed and their disproportionate role in official decision-making. ? key structural agents, be this so out of provisional necessity pending higher stages in the journey towards collective attainment of Lightform), structural allocation of resources towards the mending of yet other resources as may structure the domain and that provide for the facility and dwelling of beings, and the demolition of those Blightgeistian branches which across generations and conditions have gained an increasingly constrictive hold on the allocation and handling of means and resources. ? e. ? Yet if we may step beyond the overtrodden stage for the moment and imagine (before contextualization and reflexive conclusion thereby from any vantage point) what mass tribute to mass beings may entail just in concept, we may peel the issue back like an onion — the tribute would entail the physical and mental edification and repair of beings at large, their granted option of tribute in turn to those tasked with the overseeing of their means (i. ? By categorizing certain notions or structural measures as mere arbitrary giving of finite resources, the Blightgeistian mass conditioning apparati foreclose for many of their subjects even the entertaining of notions of structural realities most beneficial and friendly towards being-as-such (which mental closing in the first place is pernicious just in form, given imagination of even {if not especially} the most audacious sort being a source of the most encompassing, comprehensive, and innovative conceptions of better realities). ? That is, in addition to the fallacy of truth by severity in the Blightegeistian (particularly Erosive, but also Saturative) logic extends as well to the conceivable possible outcome of general well-being and positive conditions for beings; per the Overton window not only of preferred structural choices, but in believed-in outcomes, such that that which is anecdotally and unsubstantially considered "too good to be true" according to the current given matrix of knowns means it could not be true, rather than just another symptom of the here and now's mass consciousness that is fickle and historically malleable. ? It is seldom even considered how prices are paid now for extant social-structural abhorrences, often untenably even by its own underlying logic, because they are such givens that they are seldom recognized for what they are, let alone that they are not so historically perennial or based in primordial principles as they are often portrayed as being (per a common trait of the Blightgeistian mass conditioning apparati). ? That is, the mere invocation of the question of price and allocation of resources thereto as regards leveraged structural enterprises in favor of being-as-such, stands in as a substitute for actual counterpoint, as if to imply that of course it had heretofore not been considered (or even simply blithely ignored) that there would be a price for a structural enterprise not only serving being-as-such, but paying tribute to being-as-such via beings at large regularly and out of principle. ? This mere vague invocation of objectivity, “proper math”, etc, to which preference can supposedly not be but opposed, allows the positer to avoid intellectual and rhetorical responsibility in breaking down their logic; and indeed to do so would be to ultimately reveal their position null and void, for logic is not the point so much as endless domination of the Other by imagined birthright. ? a faction’s official debt), while blithely ignoring the waste done already (in both source of currency and the end it is put towards) in the official structural calculus of price, particularly price worthy of paying. ? e. ? It does so without specification except the invocation of vague abstractions posed as numbers (i. ? It is done so through hollow invocation of the existence of a price for everything done, willfully ignoring the various natures and types of cost and how they may compare to those in place with a system’s present configuration. ? In the ongoing vast structural enterprise against being-as-such, in which the Blightgeist’s general societal framework (across various territorialist factions) constricts thought and thus conception of structural possibilities across generations, it happens that ventures which even mildly address the needs of beings at large even from within the established official structural framework of a territorialist domain are reductionistically put as beggardom time and time again, as of only asking for gifts.