terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Hesyncept.txt ? To realize this is to at least start towards transcending it, and for real. ? Yet despite the rigorously enforced logistics and social order entailed in the realization of such vision, Erosive thought can still not stand its own law and imagines at the same time the lone nomad who bucks this very system Erosive thought (in whatever territorialist faction manifestation present) holds to — that is to say, it holds that only those high enough in an enforced social hierarchy may thereby transcend it. ? It manifests sadistically and gives away the lie of the Erosive cause, finding joy in Erosion’s rawest form by the lack of such in the Other in the moment as on the moment of vanquishment. ? This supposed celestial preference, borne of phantasms of the celestial archetypes (themselves in many cases phantasms for social purposes like the aforementioned), takes on likewise a blindness that sanctions the emotions engaged in in this pyrrhic and weak tantrum against the Other. ? Accordingly, it is imbued also with “love” for all entailed in the vanquishing, stupidly mapping the transmogrifying powers of death and the “blackening” in alchemical processes with any means employed onto one of of its most heedless terrestrial manifestations (heedless to the cost of the practitioner themselves, let alone their wrongful targets in this case). ? What’s more, it is imbued with a personalized “love” of the act, which in this case is reduced only to a certain preference insofar as the verb is antithetical to the act being carried out. ? Any which way, the fulfillment of the unresolved vanquishing impulse is grounded celestially in Erosive thought. ? if the vanquishing were carried out spontaneously in the vain attempt to fulfill Blightgeistian thirst for total depraved power seizure), were not of reverence, as though the fulfillment of this spontaneous vanquishing could be anything but an embodiment of reverence’s antithesis. ? e. ? As such, it holds that those vanquished, regardless of context (i. ? But Erosive thought posits this as mere blind empty deference to an imposed dogma that does not realize the impetus to the notion it now clings to, but heeds purely out of obligation fueled by a promise of punishment (be it simply losing the present battle, mode it be) and expects others to do the same. ? The reverence would simply require a sort of suspension of disbelief and a personification, an avatar at which to direct the reverence in order to believe even transiently for the moment and thereby find sustained inspiration in the heat of battle. ? The battler then would ideally (whether according to universal logic or that of the Blightgeist for different reasons) carry out their role knowingly in the seemingly omnipresent watchful eye of the celestial figure. ? But nonetheless beyond these machinations lies a salient point in the importance of mindful reverence in the conduct of conflict that it may the more turn in favor of the revering party — provided indeed that such reverence is genuine and of a right source and right reason, not given either to historically demonstrable failure or the indolence of singing the praises of atrocity while not engaging with it (not that it should be engaged per se). ? Indeed where such a figure is invoked for the vain glorification of atrocity, it be so while presented with the imagery of portents, creatures of flight, etc, as though in fact the figure were prophesizing the outcome of the battlefield; and here they are presented as harnessing the remains of battle done (say, through blood) to work their magic yet again, possibly officializing the outcome as depending in part on their shadow input. ? In such a way this figure is presented nonetheless as the impartial actor through all sides of the conflict, as a reveler in slaughter-as-such — as though to really be present only for the inspiration of whichever side should notice them the most and thereby act according to inspiration from them, which may imply then a sense of agency and potential among beings in a way uncharacteristic of Erosive thought…Except that indeed this be attributed to a kind of pre-destiny also that, insofar as a celestial figure is even invoked, must by Erosive logic be attributed to it even beyond a supposed biological cause. ? That is to say that the celestial figure so erected becomes the actual killer on the battlefield, as though to work through the terrestrial vessels of their venerators (that is according to Erosive thought) and thereby be presented as one biased in favor of the victor (be it so either post-hoc or distorted in case of this plan not coming to pass). ? Moreover, it is an attempt to celestially base such annihilation as a kind of shadow destiny beyond Erosion’s usual phantasms of biology and geography. ? Macha). ? e. ? In Erosive mythology under the Blightgeist, many celestial figures are erected or gathered and distorted from the pool of extant ones of the ages for the praise of the enterprise against being-as-such and in particular beings-as-subsets, as though to ground wanton domination and annihilation (especially along such lines) in celestial law and the “regaining of balances” (i.