terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Odialype.txt ? The riddle becomes how to dig out the valid information from all therefore told about what afflicts us at large while bearing in mind the general folly of the institutions that appear to provide most of it (or at least the most prominent and easily accessible of it), which sadly feeds into Erosive consciousness as a pretext for the enterprise against being-as-such via negligence if not outright treachery. ? The lessons learned over the course of dealing with scourge in all its adaptive harm are not just the reminder of important aspects of reality, but of the need to not need a reminder in the first place — the somewhat silent exhortation to restructure one's entire consciousness, both in a remembrance of primordial principles and in proactive evolution (which is itself a primordial principle regardless of prior manifestations now being seemingly obsolete). ? Remembrance of the obvious here is possibly in order, given especially that obviousness via seeming resemblance and familiarity is one of the most timeless tricks of scrouge, in how it by nature bears similar traits to its previous manifestations now largely conquered to spring a new and deadlier method upon its victims. ? Here again, though it is the result of mortal folly, scourge and catastrophe spurn beings into more conscious and deliberate mutual and inner care, and the seeking out of benevolent and healing roles which are the greater mark of social-structural health. ? It may involve higher vigilance for those signs which may presage the success of scourge, which vigilance may further instill in the subject a general watchful consciousness extending to deeper fundamentals in a manner not merely reactive to threats real or potential, even into primordial thought processes which the arrival of scourge may be to help re-instill at the point of forgetfulness (which forgetfulness to a degree even yielded the scourge). ? It may involve the cultivation of discipline against tendencies of relation both to one’s self and others, including even common physical habits. ? This may hold true both in degree of a particular defense and in the higher rungs of so-far evolved defenses, particularly those which are produced industrially. ? It may involve the increased use of prior means of defense against scourge that may have already eroded other means of defense and in this particular instance be provisionally necessary while still further weakening said other defense. ? This may involve the reconsideration of spatial-structural relationships and the structuring of beings’ apparati by extension. ? As such, measures must be accounted for which not only directly address scourge in its most potent present form but that grapple again with the totality of inherited societal-structural “givens” now undercut and rendered untenable on so much as the seemingly “basic”, “obvious”, “unconscious”, etc, level. ? Dovetailing with this technical concern (which in the grand universal stage further shows its validity, thinking now on the ethical implications of either decision concerning scourge and known-world-alarm concerns in general, free of any technical scientific concerns) is that of the need for being-as-such and, by extension, being at all, to be respected and accounted for in regular goings and societal action, in this particular case by working proactively to defend against scourge and to in the meantime account for those it has reached; without which the ensuing lack of civic care and trust will fracture beings at large both individually and collectively. ? The confluent evolution of both interconnected mass conditions in the known world and the evolution of scourge as a complete force means that prior known manifestations of scourge falling or disappearing does not guarantee the same thing for the present one, or even that it will decline to a low (if consistent) level. ? Likewise, it takes a discerning and honorable mentality to note that not only does this adaptive nature of scourge (particularly as it pertains to the known world and by extension world alarm) entail a general harried uncertainty regarding its future and optimal defense against it but that to a degree in this instance — especially insofar as collective mortal folly (particularly under the Blightgeist) has yielded the conditions for its very formation and is (in part therefore) a reflection of said folly on the structural level in the first place — the uncertainty is more reflective of those structural follies than of invalidity of the notion and especially world alarm regarding the severity of scourge or even mere existence in any manifestation, which in concept and in history is never fixed and entails uncertainties and great challenges in its grappling therewith. ? Further still and ironically, this great new manifestation of scourge may by its new prominence seem itself to Blightgeistian consciousness to be not as severe as its effects by the likewise increased prominence of those traits which it shares with other manifestations, such as its waxing and waning with time periods and environmental conditions. ? Part of the nature of scourge as a primordial threat, particularly in terms of adaptation and especially at new historical thresholds for beings’ collective developed defenses against it, lies in certain of its manifestations’ eventual attacking of weaknesses opened up by the use of other defenses against other manifestations of it, or in its finding of conjunction with other manifestations to create an effect that on surface inspection (or, what is more the case in the Blightgeist, disingenuous conflation) may seem attributable to the effects of the other, or a commonly known and historically trounced manifestation.