terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Rusticess.txt ? Yet it begs the question of the motive for not just the different acts, but across contexts and in particular in the stage of the system’s lifespan. ? Here the stage is set. ? One is also tasked with identifying the harmful effects of the current status quo especially as may be increasingly correlated with its domination and traced to its operations, such as privation, sickness, and reduced quantity, duration, quality of survival for both inhabitants and the surroundings, and even very means employed to operate it — particularly in the spirit of hoarding that is in a manner akin to thiefdom yet which gains validity and sublimation through the funneling of official structural power to that end (which is also really to say the end or purpose of mercenariness on the structural level for key agents in a way that enough underlings may participate in and thus gain the illusion of a fairly and magnanimously provided “chance”) at the expense of all life. ? This furnishes conception of “alternatives” (really primordials only alternative in context) in a manner hopefully not even requiring reference but being born as thought for the first time, with perhaps even the accumulation of historical wisdom. ? This may moreover take the thinker closer to the primordial principle whence the antidote to the present system is seemingly paradoxically derived and yet which in a disconnected sense even the system itself is derived from. ? Yet to more vividly find and trace the tangible cogency of these notions is in part to meet them with the aforementioned apologia. ? Finally, said system’s resulting nature of provisional necessity and conditioned thought patterns compromise beings’ capacity for care and morale in a way demonstrably inconsistent with the very principles it is carried out in the name of. ? Likewise, this being done in an ultimately consolidating act, mass systems (however nominally) more inclined towards the prizing of being-as-such and in particular mass role in systemic decision are undermined in their logistics and become increasingly nominal as said interests make conditions for mass participation or consciousness much less possible and able to act in proportion to the system itself. ? Its cumulatively consumptive nature extends to the very means harnessed for its operation, to the destruction and privation of said means, operators, and by extension the system itself, rendering it an enemy of nature and of life. ? Specifically, part of the bait of mercenary systems, both in concept and in lived experience, is the serving of provisional necessity and rewards that themselves essentially apologize for, salve, and distract from the actual subtle insidious effects it has that in the moment are often commonly attributed primarily to fellow inhabitants of that system — thereby being unjust. ? Such canon, by the force of both that wholeness of thought which correlates with Lightform and the onus in the face of the ills of the Blightgeist and its system of aggressive mercenariness in particular, may grapple especially with the system’s antimony towards nature (albeit with rhetorical tricks to paint itself as based directly in it as well as transcending it by might of an imagined will), its relation to mass systems (especially in the dilemma of mass role in systemic decision), and its bearing on being-relationships on an individual and collective scale in ways seldom conceived of especially within its inherited framework. ? Kovel and Bowles). ? e. ? To this end even the wide canon of thought of Lightform and against the Blightgeist (which canon even as concept, let alone as manifestation, is worthy of questioning and challenging, especially insofar as it may even against the Blightgeist still be beholden to the same reflexive prizing of target demographics along lines of ingrained superficial bias) is generally unknown and otherwise restricted to a few most iconic minds that are again generally only referred to as a vague nebula (i. ? In particular those more mercenary systems that by nature encourage a reflexivity via aggressive hoarding, mutual distrust, and the encouraged consolidation of means, materials, and conditions among an increasingly small circle (namely, that most embedded within the Blightgeist) gain favor by contrast and thus evoke the apologia of the system’s validity by there being only supposedly worse alternatives, be they only referenced either as a bogey or as a vague nebula surrounding the righteous center in which the thinker believes they inhabit — in essence, fear of the mere seeming chaotic frontier (real or alleged) among the more well-intentioned, and fear of loss of depraved power seizure against being-as-such for the system’s key framers and enforcers. ? Beings at large, particularly under the Blightgeist and its increasingly tested and honed mass conditioning apparati, are over a time given to nearly second-nature reflexive apologia for the means of their own oppression, barely even conceiving of it as such in that they can barely conceive of anything else anymore than they can conceive of life without the basic attributes and resources affording their continued breathing; and to break down these layers is no small task.