terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Certhles.txt ? Yet the thoughtform that does not include these harmful effects is technically far more “traditional” than that foisted upon beings at large in the present. ? Moreover, given the fixture of suffering and sacrifice in the known history of beings, especially in that some features of it may have (at least temporarily and in some contexts) been avoided or salved either by the system itself (albeit as a possibly historically necessary stepping stone to be transcended rather than stubbornly persisted in as its advocates would hold) or even simply in the era of the system’s existence without necessarily being directly accomplished by it, even the mere acknowledgement or criticism of the conditions of such suffering as they may pertain to such system are considered a criticism of life or a mere failure to grapple with life’s fixed costs; which in turn is stigmatized as ungratefulness and weakness cultivated as a (again, possibly historically necessary) cost of the benevolence of the system that its critics do not deserve the generous grace from (even as it structurally necessarily entails the very opposite treatment, which again is referred to as necessary if not in a case-by-case basis “deserved” as punishment). ? Yet it ironically by a mercenary system’s increasing hold on time and conception that the domain outside of it can seldom even be conceived of, let alone confidently engaged with — for even where such time or conception should appear for many beings, the beings are compelled to exhaustion and, with it, the reflexive decision to seek relief from grappling with the nature of the beast consuming them daily. ? It may also be to trace the various illuminative works, words, and deeds created by visionaries of ages across the most possible spatiotemporal contexts, whose insights are largely buried by the depraved will and power of imperial erasure in favor of highly narrowed or distorted (which is to say more specifically spatiotemporally disconnected to mass consciousness) works shown to predominate and speak for the age; or whose continued stubborn passing down is presented or otherwise generally assumed to be proof of a meritocracy (at least where this is convenient fo the arguer) — and these insights may include matters of division among demographics, the concept of (validity of) mass role and particularly beings at large in systemic decisions, attempts at highest conceivable living systems from primordial principles, the role of mass conditioning apparati in the abidance by conditioned systems of existence, systemic accounting errors in certain mass systems, or more collective and unitive alternatives. ? By the same token, to do so most effectively and efficiently at least in this case may be in part to work in reverse — that is, to identify and trace to the source each of the deleterious features of the system as are specific to the time in which it has predominated. ? But at best this only belies a general lack of imagination or courage to grapple with the possible totalistic and, in this case, overhauling thoughtforms and according living systems both beyond and before a present system (particularly of such a mercenary, mutually mistrustful, and overall hoarding sort). ? What’s more, this smokescreen of provisional necessity and reward, within which various reforms and accommodations may be desired, vied for, and achieved according to disconnected fragments of Lightform, may further entrench its supposed legitimacy against which any inroads are considered by nominal or incomplete advocates of the cause of being-as-such to be an assault on Lightform and on the cause of being-as-such — particularly those advocates who are of the Saturative thoughtform. ? This meeting of provisional necessity may also come with provisional rewards (be they only doled out to those of the target demographic of a territorialist faction within the Blightgeistian framework) that serve a kind of incomplete if not outright depraved contentment in its participants (particularly its more willing ones) in a way that appears to mass consciousness to prove the supposed insufficiency (especially innate) of those not as fully embedded into that system. ? It therefore behooves beings at large not only to proactively conceive of a total system free of the mechanisms presently taken for granted, but to conceive of a widespread apparati by which beings at large may be taught to conceive of this higher reality, or to take the time to ruminate and recreationally construct a total system at all — one which is beyond even being an alternative or antidote to the existing one, but arising instead out of primary, primordial values as if to arise from the original-most universal principle before the “fall”. ? Insofar as the entire system in all its various ramifications and tentacles behooves beings to certain actions that reinforce it out of provisional necessity at certain points of tension relating to their survival or thrival (at least as they may perceive it, being inclined to fear the unknown of that beyond the system), it both depravedly emboldens its apologists and appears to make hypocrites and fools of its detractors. ? Given how ambient certain widespread inherited systems of existence, conception, and general thought may be to beings, particularly those systems which prize the privileging of resources among the most deeply entrenched agents of the Blightgeist, it is in some cases barely conceivable what all of its effects are (especially as said conditioned beings have seldom, if ever, known any different or seemingly afforded to act different), let alone that they should be so deleterious and malign.