terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Bilida.txt ? The onus of evolution includes not the negligence or deliberate culling of those vulnerable to the vagaries of a great new scourge, but rather their preservation — for both the preservation of their attributes (including even base physical ones) which would be wasted thereby, and for the adaptation of methods in dealing with scourges; which methods are one in several means of beings’ slow laborious collective march to ultimate universality. ? The continuousness of mass beings as they pertain to scourges is what has kept them around at large to the present, and a new manifestation of the scourge behooves beings yet again to act in a new manner in accordance with their stage of collective historical consciousness and advancement. ? This is especially so where the growing worldliness of the world as known and according mass conditions make scourge liable to become of the world in a manner and speediness heretofore unkwown — in presence, effect, and awareness thereof. ? outward signs) is but one of several subtle tactics employed by the Blightgeistian (in particular Erosive) mind to eliminate the Other by some specious pretext of biological predestination and according justice. ? e. ? The reductionistic mapping of it onto known milder manifestations of scourges by superficial resemblance (i. ? It is not totally fixed in its manifestation and timeless, but rather of a long and continuous unfolding, as are we. ? The mere fact of there being historical parallels not as severe in effect or reaction does not negate the validity of current world alarm concerning it, especially given the adaptive nature of scourge. ? Insofar as the conditions for its status as mass scourge and source of valid world alarm depend on the conditions of mass existence even before considering the latter’s structural follies as being culpable, it may sweep suddenly over the bedrock of known mass conditions and existence as known (which “known” may actually be a historical anomaly and spatio-temporal phantom). ? It essentially has a modal logic, and by this newly adapted nature defies heretofore methods of dealing with it despite being categorically “similar”. ? Among the various forms scourge may take given its nature is one which gains strength and adaptability through one form of being or set of conditions and is then able to wreak another where previously it could not. ? It is a common feature of Erosive thought to denigrate as invalid that which is both not visible and whose invisibility cannot be leveraged to assault the cause of being-as-such along lines of hoarding of materials and conditions. ? Yet the malignant thoughtform of world alert denialism as a part of Erosive thought and more broadly of Blightgeistian thought (the true and ultimate scourge to beings) may cite both a scourge’s general invisibility or otherwise unassuming presence (especially as may be technically proven on some level through study of it) as both proof of its insignificance (aided by its being categorically or nominally similar and thus “dealt with before”) and proof of the invalidity of stated methods of defending against it by said defenders’ own standards. ? The adaptable nature of scourge may work in conjunction with its structural and interactive nature to culminate in an adaptation that is enveloped by beings and conditions (literally or figuratively) and thereby necessitates defense by various precautions. ? Their having been dealt with by beings collectively in previous instances does not tell the whole story, and forgets their general nature that paradoxically includes its capacity for transcending its own hitherto nature. ? That is to say that scourges, particularly on a mass and structurally toppling level, and especially depending on the traced source of their rise, are a mirror of general collective folly of beings. ? By such means they may suddenly and unexpectedly rise to take the crown of scourgehood insofar as they were allowed and serve as the catalyst for legitimate world alarm; though more a culmination and indication of long extant collective structural and mental follies, whose reality further threatens the presuppositions of the Blightgeist and Erosive agents in particular. ? It is the nature of natural scourges actually to adapt through gradations in order that they may carry out their most horrid pestilences. ? These various scourges being similarly named or categorized does not negate the reality of gradations, forms, and degrees which make exceptions to general methods of protection against them, let alone by such exceptions and differences annul the validity of such measures. ? Natural scourges of the world may be of shadows — that is, they create the conditions for more direct scourges to act against the survival or thrival of beings, whether in terms of their very basic functions or the mobility and adaptability of the scourge that necessitates beings’ logistical adjustment, retraction, and struggling.