terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Wasivencle.txt ? One who recognizes this and abstains, both from the ritual and the broader pattern which it reflects, wins more. ? Along such lines the tentacles of the Blightgeist behind the site if not nature of ritual will present massly conditioned recognized names behind the alluring objects, numbers and units of scale and scope that gain significance in the spatiotemporal culture by normalized registering amidst other contextually recongizable numbers, promises of nature of objects (often along binary lines), and codes and abbreviations. ? -A promise of that which is actually scarce, missing, or nonexistent, yet which entices the individual into participation so that they will in some other way participate and sacrifice some of their means once they have reached the site of ritual. ? In case where this isn’t so, the actual effect experienced by the reduction is delayed to the point of loss to the individual, but this is only recognized too late. ? -A promise of reduction in a norm of cost to the individual by the seeming introduction of a process, based on the condition of participation in the ritual; but that in fact is not a reduction from the norm so much as merely an introduction of a ritual upon which part of the cost is cast as being based on, so that if anything the cost to the individual is greater than normal and only the desperate momentary joy of perception of the contrary is given, and frequently blindly accepted. ? The deception and betrayal frequently lies in at least one of the following: ? In proportion as the compulsory labor of many is incompletely and falsely compensated through the introduction of such recreational ritual, so is said labor further foisted upon these maintainers, in severity and quantity or duration. ? Yet, in part due to the nature of the parent culture, and accordingly this recreational ritual offered, the ritual itself shorthands and betrays as it rewards, and passes externalities of likewise extra-compulsory labor onto those tasked out of provisional necessity disguised as “freedom of choice” with the maintenance and tending of the site and actions of such ritual. ? It also both pacifies them out of insurrection and fuels their continued contribution to the stores and wares of the Blightgeist via the ritual of compulsory labor forced upon them. ? This is in part due to the fact that within the afforded bounds of the Blightgeist such as create that compulsory and frequently unnecessary labor disguised as inherently valuable both as principle and as action (often through the lense of “production” and ”productivity”), this exception made both partakes within the acceptable conditioned framework of the Blightgeist via acquisition and ownership in itself (especially in a way which involves the means expended to feed the Blightgeist and the individual’s own Blightgeist-conditioned impulse of ownership and acquisition in itself), and brings a joy that fuels the individual beyond the fatigue instilled in them by the other monotonies of the Blightgeist-granted existed (whose actual invalidity and severity they are frequently in denial of in part for this reason). ? reduction of rest) even if it causes more damage in the long term. ? e. ? It is often according to such impulse that those conditioned and convening accordingly will make exception to an instilled (albeit rightful) resentment of other rituals and norms encoded by the culture such as “natural” compulsory and normally scheduled labor for its own sake, and will summon greater will and discipline for this exception at greater cost to their well-being than they would for that normal ritual that technically costs them less at that point of action (i. ? Such convention is often, per nature of both such impulse and the parent culture that birthed it, in close proximity (even temporally) to those likewise conditioned rituals which purport of values such as gratitude. ? At many historical points, those within the grip of the Blightgeist will convene out of something spanning a spectrum of circumstantial necessity and mass conditioning into the supposed value (within at least one aspect of the Blightgeist) of acquisition and ownership, even as this contradicts the other conditioned value of preservation of means by which this acquisition is sought.