terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Wifteg.txt ? That is, one could infer at least part of the nature of the thing under investigation, such as knowledge itself, by its consistent function and relation to consciousness as we all on some level possess -- our knowledge of knowledge. ? Thus, knowing in this case lies in the relating of the phenomena to consciousness, particularly in a way which would serve its betterment of the one being conscious. ? That is, though individual perceptions of phenomena on even the immediate level may vary in style, form, and inevitably quality and accuracy, similar general paths of inference may be embarked upon which for each individual slowly further reveal the contour of total truth to be got at. ? In the case of phenomena consciousness can perceive, at least on some level and in the final manifesting stage, the universal laws and thus truth which yielded the phenomena being beheld, which is a general known (or piece thereof) from which the broader and more universal unknown can be induced. ? on a teleological if not biological and ecological basis), and yet also outside consciousness' sphere in the ways in which it does not; as not needing the consciousness or consciousness-holder in order to exist and act. ? e. ? Moreover, consciousness can identify the thing as being in the former's sphere in part by serving an interactive function with it (i. ? That is, consciousness paradoxically relates to all that it encounters as something nonetheless outside of it -- it knows something as in a sense unknown, as entering a part of its sphere while nonetheless being identifiable as being outside of its sphere. ? Accordingly one must analyze the nature of consciousness and its processes in the generation of at least supposed truth and knowledge. ? The basis for these presuppositions must therefore as a matter of survival and thrival consist at least in part of some of the faculties which could not be employed for investigation without our existence, and therefore speak to the validity of being-as-such; for otherwise the investigation cannot be carried out. ? This may therefore require a sort of parallel working back given that the presuppositions must be very carefully and rigorously established in their basis when by their nature of presuppositions they generally are not, and so the conclusions they yield which appear to abide by their dictates may be but a case of blind leading blind. ? This would involve a rigorous scientific inference of that which is not yet known or seen by a working back from what is, though this itself can only ever rest on some sort of presuppositions that must themselves be decided on and selected. ? Thus a system could be devised for carrying out truth pursuit and identifying it. ? Such a false truth pursuit can be identified by its content consisting largely in the fervent attempted negation of other truths and the holding of the supposed actual truth as something entirely inner and individual, as not something able and willing to be disclosed at large in its content at any threshold of available understanding by outside forces -- for the content is actually absent entirely except as a mere ego expression. ? The image of truth pursuit may in fact be mere zeal for the selfishly ambitious leveraging of that which by this or that lower mortal impulse may at least initially appear as truth, as if to be so hungry for truth as to eagerly grab and wield one of the closest semblances of truth there is to hold it aloft, rather than to truly mentally search and probe in order to at least get at a more substantial semblance of truth.