terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Accomplabend.txt ? It is a relatively new and specifically historical form of consciousness which not only recognizes this as a historical pattern but may yet stand to learn (or at least attempt to learn, with mixed results) the ultimate by the conscious working back from the edifices and mirages of the icons and symbols (such as concerning generative, creative, and procreative forces), the nature and intention of their design, etc, to ultimate principle. ? But frequently the generated icons and symbols of often abstract universal principle (valid in conception or not) are but shadows of the universal principles themselves, the true understanding of which precludes need of said icons and symbols yet whose ultimate mortal attainment depends on them as a rung, as a contradictory and general phase whose grasping leads to overcoming leads to deepened understanding of the ultimate that contains the now passed stage in fuller form and context; although standardized culture generally forgets this and sinks into dogmatic enforcement of the icons and symbols as well as the service thereof. ? After all, the ultimate is to some degree arrived at from the humblest points and beginnings, which clear noticing attention and adherence to is frequently most difficult and forgotten in an individual’s journey, which is often first consciously started on only after the dim and frequently externally prompted remembrance of the journey after it first passes from a deeply ingrained and conscious presence to a forgetting attended by an implacable sense of something being now missing in the course of the individual’s general journey of existence (which common existential folly is to be overcome). ? That is, the conscious awareness of, drive for, and trust in that which is beyond one’s total purview — philosophy in its substance, for which a variety of angles and methods of thought and rumination can be learned and ingrained; so that it is not just viewed as a necessarily eternally exclusive province for which only lies and shadows can be cast to the masses. ? All this is largely a function of thoughtfulness, which is to say the ability, willingness, habit, and art to consciously think on matters both present and not present before the individual. ? Therefore the more advanced the individual comes, the more ample and substantial a substance they can be suited to engage and absorb, bearing in mind that there are different forms of advancement or maturity and that some are more holistic and better entail the parallel development of other forms -- such as those which entail not only the proper thought for the socially cast categories of learned and unlearned, but in the first place the pre-transcendence of that thoughtform and even the parent limited culture that may have conceived it. ? Whereas this is understood in the wisdom of Lightform, under the Blightgeist it is used to cast gradations of universal understanding as themselves being universal as necessity, to the perpetual neglect if not purposeful misleading and debasement of a socially categorized “unlearned”, as well as an according dimming and corruption of the “learned” by the casting down of their gaze from the beyond of wisdom to their fellow beings now cast underneath them, and by the change in their conception of their own learnedness as occurring not by quality or depth of insight as much as the mere comparison and contrast of their largely inherited materially conditions relative to those of the “unlearned”. ? Thus even where a sort of progress or maturity can be found to correlate with an ability, willingness, and efficiency in an individual to comprehend and see through a solution to a problem is to generally be seen (the earlier in their life and education the better) as an innate faculty ripe with potential to be awakened and that has simply not yet been as awakened as a pure function of time, place, and circumstance, rather than as a faculty that is either static or either presented in such a way as to widely and dangerously be perceived as static as a pre-justification for ill treatment and material inequality. ? Though persistent reasoning in the face of an issue may frequently be cast as a factor purely of maturity, intellect, or character, there is the matter of incentives and cultural conditioning acting upon the moment of testing, as well as the matter of the validity and importance of the problem presented in a world of manifold, everpresent, and highly varied stimuli, natural or artificial; and the matter that some within a myopic culture are by self-fulfilling prophecy more exclusively conditioned and educated to the “understanding” of matters presented in the problem, the according statistical outcomes in understanding only confirming the systemic bias.