terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Systemic_Ensnaring_Boundaries_of_Knowing_and_Provisionally_Necessary_Condition The Blightgeistian framework is a boundary within which contained, small, provisionally and caveatly necessary changes occur but meet their limit and cost within The Blightgeist itself, as evinced by cross-subset systemic opportunity facilitating the lashes of said structures which will convert and sublate their devouring and at-times still subset-hierarchical ways, with the mere heretofore goal of cross-subset entry into a position of opportunity (within the Blightgeist’s framework) being recognized and treated as success. Here, systemic integrity is measured according to this outward quota, ignoring the often-nebulous damage from both outside opposition to such measure for its cross-opportunity by Erosive subjects, and the meantime practices of these structures as they meet their limits by accommodating the historically-but-flawedly-and-provisionally necessary changes from the increasing entry of other being subsets into societally-established-and-contained opportunity. For as long as this can be sustained, with a view ever towards a distant tomorrow that posterity (particularly as personally known and deeply loved {though by Blightegeistian conditioning not in aggregate like they should be} by the population) shall inherit, the at-best provisional conditions shall be gladly forwarded for posterity’s sake, engineering guilt-based loyalty from kin to kith to Blightegeistian framers along such lines. Emphasis of territorial present as a manner of acknowledging and “hearing” subsets of beings, the maintenance of technically preferable conditions within a destructive structural framework, fairness by contrast to another offered systemic option even insofar as it is merely stated and tokenized rather than real — all this is the bait to partake in the perpetuation, even willingly, of The Blightgeist and its hideous conditions. To this end, promise of equal footing in such a system can easily elide the precise ways this is (or may later retroactively) be meant to quell in the general public mind the resistance to such a system in all its lashes. In fact, mere gestures to total participation gain favor while eliding the particular ways participation is constituted under the Blightegeist, if indeed even such participation and according reward is granted at all (or the rewards are truly according) and not just proposed to a general desperate set of beings. Saturative forces (if indeed they are not simply Erosive) propel global alert and desperation into further societal apparati rather than simply fleeing or passing off to others the conditions of global alert FOR the apparati as out-and-out Erosion is won’t to do. Yet this stumbles through the salient truth that advancement through the source of a global alert does not absolutely (that is, beyond current dominant systems) preclude maintenance of regular living means relative to current societal tendency (if the latter can even live at all without tending to the former); and where it does in practice is an indictment of the structure and logic of the system.