terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - The_Dishonest_Parrying_of_the_Fight_for_Being-as-such A common catch in Blightgeistian and especially Erosive thought as regards prizing of essence of being over its husk is the assumption of the husk being in particular ways manifested by essence, whether pre-destinedly or according to any regular or significant behaviors or thoughtforms, and this is often culturally decided on by Blitghtgeistian framers; so that now, only aspects of the husk it designates as providing a window into essence are actually omitted from the designation of the husk, while maintaining the air of prizing the essence ORIGINALLY and thus the more rightly (for Erosive thought is more prone to prizing ORIGINATION AS SUCH, or distorted vision of yore QUA yore and origination). It does this while proclaiming to speak from and through some notion or icon of the Absolute; and to, by so presuming and following such word, be absolutely taking this principle to heart despite inter-contradictory pledges it draws from other parts or aspects of the same supposed and handed-down (often through various contexts if not generations, ever-increasing) universal mandates of said icon, which content is seldom even inspected or integrated inwardly so much as adopted foremost as mandate (often with an at least implied or assumed threat of punishment). With this trick in presentation, the lopsided civil-societal topologies of beings’ conditions is the more advanced and justified, even arising partly from it in the first place. It cannot be taken as a surprise, then, that beings en masse so realizably threatened at a structural level upon the inevitable reckless and thus abruptly self-revealing encroachment of Blightgeistian structure would rise against it. Decrying of generalizing thought about subsets of beings cannot hold when it concerns subsets who voluntarily serve a structure built and managed for a clear purpose, with specific protocol trained for in no uncertain methods — as though to generalize it were to generalize a subset of being-as-such as is either inherited or consensually tended to as in a natural general personal (rather than institutional) inclination. Such mental pitfalls are in the first place the basis of a cudgeling class of a system of the Blightgeist, and acknowledging this general tendency among beings cannot be taken as a timeless inevitability to which any counterforce is futile or vain — for evolution depends in part on a kind of denial, ignoring anyway the historical amnesia in casting cudgeling classes as perennial. The mere presence of culturally known, nominal progress-driven givens and rewards — which management by its general creators and coordinators is likely to change and be slowly diminished in effectiveness over time — does not but lessen the overall damage done by the birthing system as a form of social leverage and legitimization.