terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - "From Hightower Hubris to Forgotten Living System Science" Trite canards of necessity and morality under the Blightgeist are intercontradictory and yet often employed both at once to pass general muster for societal subjects under Blightgeistian conditioning, and this includes not only compromise but compromise of compromise itself -- that is, in settling for half-measures (if not deliberately pursuing them) while under the umbrella of principled perseverance, regardless of the ultimate dilution of the action under negotiation upon its final form, which may by such point only be nominal and yet gain countenance and passive ignorance thereof by the public for the supposed valiance of its process and the fact that it was pursued at all. At such point its entailed expenses, possibly even passing as signifiers of the measure’s success and therefore being a sign of culturally conditioned acceptability regardless of its actual final form and content, may be squandered on an actual content of the measure (or, what is to say, label or official title of a measure) that is the opposite of the supposed plan behind it. What’s more, the use of the measure according to a declared emergency in inter-territorialist conflict (or the ever-looming threat thereof) engenders the measure’s function and use in such terms and for such purposes, thereby diluting the function and purpose of such measure going forward -- especially where it concerns the maintenance of civil living systems and the according degree of health and well-being of citizens -- though ironically this be forwarded in the name of a global enterprise whose actual nature concerning the globe is in its inter-territorialist conflict, engagement, and encroachment of one of the Blightgeist’s ever interconflicting tentacles in the first place, willfully ignorant or hiding of the actual nature and use of those living systems’ components such as regard structure, electricity, interconnectivity, social well-being and success, etc. Under this calculus, truth is merely the more attained and proven both by and in the name of SPITE, a key trait of territorailist logic that the Blightgeist champions. That this be done paradoxically (and often only nominally at that) to prove the validity of a system that is also likely only nominally used by a territorialist domain (as evinced by its territorailsm itself)o nly sets back the enterprise of Lightform among beings while being framed as a necessary pre-measure for the attainment of it, appealing to fear and desperation of beings so that the ensuing failure of the measure can be pointed to as an outside threat to Lightform itself (which the Blightgeist in fact does not recognize in its true nature and only invokes in a particular form that is really another form of itself) as a continuing pretext for further Blightgeistian measures up until the point at which the Blightgeist can afford to take off its own mask and not only brazenly be itself (mainly in Erosive form) but also convince even its own subjects that it punishes of its own validity. This also doesn’t account for the willful waiting for the point of emergency at which even the most indolent and haf-measured of actions regarding the issue can be taken (and at great expense and time) in order to gain for the Blightgeist its legitimacy, if only in the fact that opposite actions were taken by previous icons of a particular Blightgeist territory; and this “opposition” is primarily in the mere visage, decorum, and allowed range of procedure within the particular Blightgeist territory, rather than actually opposite in principle or actual action. Nonetheless, said fake or half-measure actions may contain within them a kernel of truth, such as regarding the obligation of mercenary entities of the globe to be structurally limited (insofar as such system can be said to be valid or at least have to exist for the time being at all) and beholden to the multitude that (intentionally or not, willfully or not) erected and supported them, especially given that the vast majority of such multitude did so out of a systemic obligation for various immediate personal needs and did not specifically consent to he existence and widespread cultural, economic, and otherwise systemic predominance of such entities. Whether by actual dishonest long-term intention or compromise through systemic procedure over the long-term, the ending result now compromised relative to the original aim of the measure, if even noticed, will become a barometer of future normalization and expectation about what measures are possible, practical, expectable, or even moral. Those within the leadership system of a Blightgeistian territory in favor of a particular measure or the degree of its enactment may nonetheless compromise for the sake of compromise — that is, to lessen degrees or standards in order that the opposed may more likely agree to it, leading to a long-term race to the bottom in principles and standards as any (if not especially) of the most sincere and being-serving systemic measures are repeatedly diluted. This gains more social approval where there is statistically proven lesser degree enacted not only by previous icons, but those at least nominally opposed within the Blightgeistian framework or range of proposed possibility, in a “partial retraction of the plunged knife” from beings at large. This build-up of desperation and eagerness to reach resolution enshrines the mere resolution or act of technical change as true progress grounds for praise, as though parties involved would not expend such time and effort as they did for any reason but of sincerity, to say nothing of their actual long-term schemes of power seizures (be they pyrrhic and motivated by an inner void and hubris). Such proposed measures and their ensuing dispute call attention also to not only the general lack of knowledge or care concerning the contiguousness of mere structural or physical realities of civil living systems and according positive conditions with more parasocial issues relating to them, but also in the wrongful systemic necessity of having to leverage such measure for the issue under focus in order to have a hope of successfully leveraging other measures which may otherwise not find harbor within the systemic limits of the Blightgeist. For the very science of living systems and their according structures, being historically and thus habitually based in a certain medium or conception of physical form and material, must inevitably expand to include or at least consider those not of such material or form, and this may well be the essence of such study all along, beyond the historically-specific tools with which it may be more directly concerned. Ironically, the longstanding neglect of such concepts in the Blightgeistian framework and according public perception of reality and societal possibility leads to their further neglect as the Blightgeist (mainly Erosion) cannot comprehend the degree of decay of such living systems and the according consequences due to the longstanding remaining function of such systems from prior advances and maintenance, concerned (if disingenuously) always with socio-economic givens as may appear most immediately threatened by even the slightest of structural or conceptual (especially as the two are connected) change.