terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - "Winding Steps Towards the Primordial Principle of Ultimate Diplomacy" In the at least largely global joining of being-subsets by the newly inspired recognition of the value of being-as-such as is reflected in a present cause, the urging of other sets of beings (in a way beyond territoriality, however subconsciously) towards the transcendence of habit into proactive interfacing with being-as-such both in its particularities regarding subset and in primordial universal principle…This call becomes all the clearer. Here the heretofore unsung role, innovation, and spirit of natural establishments by beings at large for the at least potential sake of being as such is the more proactively noticed, as is the important of amassed resources by beings and the potential for their allocation towards beings at large for being as such. The mere basic spirit of commitment or fervor as is found in the act and acting party being urged can be recognized in its potential for the goal of global communality, as being harvested beyond its current use for both a future and a return to the primordially just. As part of this ongoing inner dialectic and Jacob’s Ladder-esque process of realization of this principle by the urged party, channeling of this meantime spirit of commitment into a turning towards diplomacy in a geopolitical challenge for the mere sake of old territorial allegiances being fought for is a step towards the high principle of ultimate global diplomacy that annuls that very guiding thoughtform. In the temporally variably reachable destiny of ultimate diplomacy, recognition of the urging parties in such situations as they may urge, both as they are individually (as subsets) and as a primordial collective being, is also necessary. Yet it is often through very recognition of the form and procedure of outreach in securing a preliminary diplomatic step that the primordial principle of ultimate diplomacy is the more grasped at, even as this tentative measure stands to improve yet more. The further potential for inter-recognition among parties of the primordial principle of ultimate diplomacy lies in the many nodes of connection employed by different parties and being-subsets in both diplomacy itself and the distribution of information by which such processes are noticed and decided on. The exact constellation of these connections, and their varying levels of success, potential, and improvability are made conscious. Furthermore, deeds and agreements made in even the processing of information between parties, outside of the potential official agreements of official channels (who represent geographic areas), inculcate an agreeableness towards diplomacy as such and ingrain it as a more natural and defensible state and principle. Further still, the agreeing to and acting upon even provisional measures for the progressment of parties towards ultimate diplomacy inculcates restraint, patience, and consideration (that is to say, primordial listening) in the parties that, if it does not lead to a new threshold of diplomacy and outreach, at least feeds the akashic record and serves as a harvesting of power of primordial being-unity and leaves an indelible memory in parties involved at large to realize later. The further along in progress or even time this process goes, the more the universal principle of the validity of being as such shall drive beings at large towards the realization of the universal principle of diplomacy and outreach as such. Though the ultimate emancipation of beings as such is a destiny that entails even the loss of individual beings, it also (if not eo ipso) behooves beings to the primordial (yet proud!) duty towards the serving of beings at large and as such, that such vain loss shall occur no more — in both geopolitical context and ultimate universality. This will entail both sacrificial intervention by conscientious beings into the atrocity of such geopolitics and the realization of the brutalizing party bit by bit in their inner error, though the latter should never be left to automatic realization even should it be technically inevitable; for the meantime atrocity stands to be stopped and counteracted, and the underlying will of such resistance is part and parcel of ultimate emancipation itself. Realization of the particularity of such atrocity both in overall scope and particular targets may spur beings at large both to a new plateau of outreach for the targeted and a general consciousness in the first place of the full being and valuables of such targets in all their nuance, nature, and topology. Here in the ensuing frenzy of outreach and march towards ultimate diplomacy as a collective is ultimate emancipation the more inched towards. Though this will itself entail a most daunting sacrifice, the principle of sacrifice employed in this shall furnish the later transcendence of such mode of sacrifice itself. Moreover, the principle of outreach will be more consciously recognized as the counterforce to that which further necessitates it, as opposed to the piling on of further brutality. The question remains how this is enacted both in particulars and across time, both geopolitically and in the general collective memory of beings.