terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Predestination Phantoms in the Fight for Thoughtpower of Beings-As-Such Proper understanding of the context for conditions beyond the absolutist dogma of predestination (against being as such) proffered by the Blightgeist involves looking coldly and thoroughly at the many interrelating and contiguous conditions across time and beyond the culturally given controlled-frame narratives and “highlight compilations” of such events. The imposition of conditions on being subsets QUA territories within the territorialist logic of the Blightgeist brings a privation then labeled by the Blightgeist as being due to an inherent and essentially perennial nature, yet the transcendence of such privation (or, what more is to say, living beyond past privation in the present, be such past ever so forgotten) is pointed to again as proof of an inherent and perennial quality in the opposite (that is to say, positive) direction, mainly as a means of tokenizing said being-subset to make the Blightgeist’s own enterprise against being-as-such seem totally impartial and only concerned with truth — so as to make most but the more stringent and learned opposers comply. Moreover, such imposition of conditions itself, in addition to the underlying Blightgeistian thought form yielding both such action and the post-hoc judgment of beings’ “inherent” and “perennial" quality, is often found to be totally mercenary, which unto itself belies a poverty of spirit and confidence to transcend own conditions except by the forceful transference of that imagined impotence into reality on another being-subset, with the mythology of twisted “predestination” added post-hoc. Under such a thought system, the priorities of endless extraction via coercion (especially across generations) and outright slaughter are ever in shift and in conflict. However, consider the paradox of Blightgeistian thought regarding the supposed nature of beings in a more or less eternal topology, that this perennially valid criteria is always only perennial in its current form, and would by its own logic annul the validity of the Blightgeist’s own luminaries from the past by the fact that they would not reliably do well by Blightgeistian state criteria for thought power and being validity today; especially where the Blightgeist (particularly in its Erosive aspect) is ever nostalgic, clinging to phantoms of inaccessible but semi-tangible times and places, yet cannot but hold to its own present artifices for leverage in the willing of an imagined past. Such criteria, while not unique to the particular era in which its latest generalized official conception was birthed on the level of the state, is also a byproduct of that very historical development, one which in its infancy derided its own “predecessors” that contemporary Blightgeistian nostalgia respects as boorish and obsolete. It is again only as memory if not potentiate or extinguishing resource that a being can find appreciation (however incomplete and tainted) by the Blightgeist (or deeply embedded in it) overall, and not as being-as-such (even where such being may belong to an officially recognized and “blessed” being-subset within the Blightgeist’s imagined topology of being-validity). To this end, conditions are imposed and kept in cycle that deny “predestinedly invalid” being-subsets the overall conditions or even time (particularly as afforded by conditions) to pursue their own edification that the Blightgeistian agents of the “predestinedly valid” being-subsets do, and these conditions themselves are stated (and indeed in the constant preoccupying moments of experience of this) as being perennial, as being always the case by some immutable yet far-distant logic or purpose. The attempted legitimation of the thought system underlying such system of conditions and treatment of beings at large is but one of many instruments employed to maintain the Blightgeist’s long-term pyrrhic power seizure and process of accumulation, and by extension its endless enterprise against beings at large and being-as-such in particular. Still, the agents of the Blightgeist, in their blind and desperate embracement of official state-sanctioned criteria for thoughtpower as a means by which to make sense of reality within their extant framework, nonetheless stumble obliviously through the validity of the very unifying (that is to say, favoring of being-as-such) system it claims to invalidate and oppose; for such system allows for the maintenance of even conditions for beings that would only further bear out the supposed topology of inherent value of being-subsets (or even beings individually) were they permitted. This is particularly true in the ways in which energy and resources diverted towards the maintenance of basic and essential conditions, or competition within such system, is obsolete and gives way to absolute flourishing and the exercise of the mind in purely constructive and recreational fashion. After all, the effects of brain drain in squalid conditions are accumulative, across circumstances and generations, as those afflicted (genreally of a being-subset targeted by the Blightgeist) are the more given to the conditions imposed based on the very extant assumptions of their supposed inherent value that the official criteria thereof is supposedly meant to bear out. The realization of this in all its truth is itself a transcendence of the ultimate brain drain occurring within the Blightgeistian agents that yield such conditions, beyond any physical or material affects in the moment on the individual as-yet-to-be-ultimately-avenged souls.