terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - "Potential of Thoughtpower Beyond Institutional Myopia" Within the Blightgeistian framework, the mere presence of "findings of truth” through official channels (be they ones frequently derided by agents of that very Blightgeist for reasons relating to the inevitable contradictory impediment of even such agents' convenience by that same system, ironically), as well as the supposed “dispassionateness” of them (be they really only in regards to the myopic discarding of a being subset and thus the notion of being as such, but not so dispassionate as regarding its only underlying agenda except as reflecting the general inner deadness that goes hand in hand with such myopia), is itself sufficient grounds for truth, regardless of the actual content of such findings or how they may be explained. Within such a system, the actual content and potential of thoughtpower across being subsets, to say nothing of being as such (which the Blightgeist, it is established, already denies), is preemptively disregarded, and an official and culturally sanctioned system of “recognizing" a supposedly innate value of beings is erected after the fact; and though such system is constantly adapted and subject to its own time, to the point of contradicting its own criteria across ages that it nonetheless in all ages would dogmatically swear and kill by and thus show that it would kill its self from multiple other epochs, it is still pointed to at all times as perennial, dispassionate, and true — more to the point, true merely because it is dispassionate and dispassionate merely because it is true. Conveniently for itself, such system disregards the ways in which divergence of conditions across environments yields divergence in not only thoughtpower and thoughtcharacter, but the ability both individually and systemically within each environment to recognize such thought power and thoughtcharacter, the environment generally holding it, and the reciprocal relation between the two. Such conditions are the more exacerbated by agents of the Blightgeist under the imperialist delusion against being as such, denying the potential of the targeted being subsets and the power of cycles of conditioning and habit from both beings’ natural and cultural environments. The point of the Blightgeist’s officially established criteria in the first place is the leveraging of official pretext for opposition towards being subsets and, by proxy, the very notion of being as such; and it was established (or at least reappropriated and distorted) with the understanding that target being subsets of the Blightgeist’s wrath did not have the environmental, cultural, and material conditioning by which to even logistically meet such criteria, which the Blightgeist would seek to impose globally according to its stated premise of optimizing beings at large through the culling of supposed categorical undesirables. For under the Blightgeist, respect, education, and material conditions are the more given and guarded to prized being subsets (be they for long-term expediency in the Blightgeist’s pyrrhic power junkiedom) and deprived or eliminated toward target being-subsets. In the broader tendency of beings, advanced, deliberate, recreational, etc, development often comes after the fight for survival and security of conditions is won, whether materially or spiritually. Yet the Blightgeist’s logic is wont to at one point condemn such being-subset as predestinedly and perennially lesser for sufferance under conditions circumstantial if not imposed by a (often territorialist) branch of the Blightgeist, and at another point when those conditions are improved praise said subset as a token “exception” proving the Blightgeist’s supposed impartiality in their position against being as such as objective truth, willfully embracing amnesia again with respect to both history and the Blightgeist’s own stance and according official criteria systems within it. That logical, scientific, and historical counterpoises are preemptively derided as arising first and foremost from envy, jealousy, ressentiment, etc, speaks only to the strategic myopia and intimidation tactics inherent to the Blightgeist in all its methodologies and notions, as well as to those same vices it finds in its counterpoisers in that it cannot bear beings that exist (let alone thrive) beyond its own criteria and conception, or that such beings do not submit to the Blightgeist’s insatiable junkie appetite for power that is ultimately pyrrhic. Agents of such a movement for that matter generally elide over the proven historical innovations of their target being-subsets and the role in the Blightgeist in their conditional, circumstantial, and historical burial. But one who sees through, lives beyond and above, and instructs against such a thought form rises — not just in reaction and rediscovery of one's own innate potential, but in mere proactive community and creativity itself, in primordial innocence.