terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Scuscuedis.txt ? Thus we are always compelled to detect and monitor the margins. ? This also does not account for the fact that for "structural", "practical", etc, reasons, many of those in the geographical and cultural fringes of the territorialist faction, whose domain and conditions were wrested from themselves under the vice of said faction, are by their own geographical domain allocated the least official input in the running of the system that contains them. ? Such faction's official system thus gives the lie to itself even per its stated values, aside from its fallacious premise of systemic punishment over such issue. ? Where a territorialist faction has (by its nature per Blightgeistian thoughtform) decided on the mission to exterminate a being-subset according to biogeophantasms, it does so secretly by the implementation of proxy measures that appear to reduce an issue yet knowingly elide other manifestations of the same issue in a manner that punish the targeted being-subset under the pretext of the issue. ? Moreover, the various possible available nodes in the aforementioned pipelines depend largely upon mobility and affordability as imposed by the system, leaving those without to scratch and bite in the pit of privation and its flimsy granted options. ? Nor can it account for the cycles such as less means by which to pass the enforced gauntlet of the official institution-to-conditions or education-to-conditions pipeline, the privation and heightened tensions precipitating murder, or the lack of kinship support (at least as is possible and fruitful within the confines of the system). ? Furthermore, the mere official and nominal lifting of a long-closed extant social-structural gate between the being-subset in question and the means and conditions afforded to the domain at large in which they dwell (namely, the domain of the imposed territorialist faction) does not account for the inter-generational cumulative reserves of such means and conditions, and the cycle of privation and desperation that then invoke the lash of the systemic overseer that is the Blightgeist (primarily via its chosen cudgeling class). ? That some members of the above being-subset in question may by a confluence of contradictory circumstances rise from within the halls of officiality does not negate this truth so much as reveal further the ceiling of possibility within the system, to say nothing of the ways in which such system at its core is anathema to being-as-such and would not by the logic of Lightform permit even the complete filling out of the halls of officially with members of said being-subset. ? Upon deeper digging it may be revealed that in fact the category put up in the public imagination as representing even nebulously the at-least nominally worst impulses of beings is in many instances that of the most arbitrarily and culturally imposed and contingent "crimes", or the loosest association therewith as imposed from above along biogeophantasmic lines, further giving the lie to the legitimacy of imposed official code as a barometer of individual worth -- for such mentality reveals only a blind legal positivism. ? From there, any term for societally-considered "aberrant" behavior becomes a code for the bogey being-subset in question, helping to elide the ways in which the most severe and violent actions (according to the calculus of the society that recognizes them but does not recognize its own on as much as a structural level) arise out of desperation of conditions that are again instigated or at least untended from prior systemic mistreatment. ? That is to say, the existence of a movement in the name of being-as-such via being-subset, whose actions appear to violate the veneer of civility underlying a society which is by its very premises and genesis predicated against the being-subset, becomes the stand-in for what is really an extant hatred of the being-subset sublimated in the current social framework. ? Where movements coalesced around the respect of being-as-such via the call for respect to being-as-subset -- that is to say, a particular subset of being most culturally and systemically mistreated in the wider Blightgeistian enterprise against being-as-such -- are most deeply reprimanded, it is often in a post-hoc association of the movement itself with the being-subset so as to cloak what is really an attack in thought on the being-subset being called as that movement.