terminal 0
unfinished
NEFX - Creycl.txt ? That is, it may be that one of our general collective hubrises we are to overcome is in the conception of our ultimate path as being linear and, if it should appear to prevail over by others by this or that faculty, must thereby be totalistically superior and even proven to be so by the circumstantial survival or brutal thwarting of another that under different circumstances would more thrive -- this conception of the path must be an integral one of which we are a sub-path seeking ultimate synthesis, lest we make the mistake of killing our golden creature and thus in a sense ourselves, which "our" encompasses more than we yet currently see. ? We can find that the path to Lightform is not linear in that it is fully condensed upon us, but that it concerns the parallel striving of various paths by various beings or subsets of us seeking resolution by their reconvergence, and that we can find currently existing examples of others striving on a parallel path from a split with those before us many generations ago. ? For these even often very basic historical implements and thoughtforms that we may inherit to our benefit and feel (however unconsciously) by our side regularly as knowns, did once both represent and effect a fundamental change in our forebears, and to return again (intergenerationally speaking) to the source of the idea or invention at a different point of awareness is to learn yet something new, helping show that part of the path to Lightform for us collectively is the creation of means by which we may consistently hold on across generations to beneficial thoughtform impetuses without need of return or the overcoming of the burden of our historical tail. ? Moreover, by getting at the impetus to our present knowns especially as they pertain to us on an even fundamental scientific level -- such as that which we have collectively across generations come to make norm and habit, or fashion into something useful -- we stand to understand more thoroughly engage with and understand them in their full nature, that is, to remember them and the impetus to their normalization in the first place; and thereby we evolve yet again, going forwards by being willing to delve backwards, which evolution then allows subsequent attempts at such to be done more advancedly and efficiently despite the ever-lengthening and ever-burdening tail of our own history. ? Here too we may find a spatial as well as temporal locus of historical and evolutionary significance once less considered, the very significance of which may undercut subsequent myopic notions on the nature of such evolution which likewise fail to see the contiguousness of things and of not just us but subsets of us; and it may be revealed that the biological, societal, cultural, environmental, and, yes, spatiotemporal roots of we-as-known today are at once alien and telling, containing forgotten hints as to the key to our own progression. ? For this point is not just of mere static time, but of a condensed origin point for various things which would come to each in their own right proliferate and appear as separate and specialized, such as biology, society, culture, and environment; and how this proliferation came to be, by what sparks. ? 7 million to 5,000. ? e. ? To attain greater and more universal understanding from a figuratively higher vantage point, as though to behold phenomena and ideas in one's daily goings as if through piercing view from the celestial as well as across within the terrestrial and view all their interconnections, is in part to start with the start -- that is, to begin with a survey of a vast timespan starting at the temporal and conditional origin of that which is known today, which exercise spurs investigation and expansion of what is known today rather than merely taking it as known; and to remember the quantity of time ago that this origin point starts at, i.